User talk:RickTommy
From Homestar Runner Wiki
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (→Previous edit summary) |
(→RE: Block warning) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
RickTommy, if you're warned about being blocked, don't try to fight it by making up a bogus excuse as to why it was necessary to do what you did. Just say sorry and don't do it again. We all know you did it so there is no point fighting it. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 01:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC) | RickTommy, if you're warned about being blocked, don't try to fight it by making up a bogus excuse as to why it was necessary to do what you did. Just say sorry and don't do it again. We all know you did it so there is no point fighting it. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 01:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I wasn't denying anything. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 06:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | :I wasn't denying anything. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 06:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Loafing told you that he might block you, but then you got defensive and said that the edit doesn't matter. Well it does matter. Look, if you ever get a block warning, don't try to fight it, just take the advice you're given. Thanks, {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 01:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Support== | ==Support== |
Revision as of 01:42, 7 November 2010
Contents |
Wits' end
We have asked you repeatedly not to police the wiki. This means telling other users what to do or how to do it. You simply do not seem to have the knack for when it is appropriate. We've asked you to play fair on the featured article selection page, not to edit others' comments, and not to swear in edit summaries. Yet, things aren't getting better. We don't seem to be getting through to you at all, even after you were blocked for two weeks for disruption. So, I'm going to block you three weeks. Furthermore, I think it would be best if you stayed away from the featured article selection for at least a month. — It's dot com 20:48, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
RE: Block warning
RickTommy, if you're warned about being blocked, don't try to fight it by making up a bogus excuse as to why it was necessary to do what you did. Just say sorry and don't do it again. We all know you did it so there is no point fighting it. Rondleman! Stuff I did.Talk. 01:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- I wasn't denying anything. RickTommy (edits) 06:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Loafing told you that he might block you, but then you got defensive and said that the edit doesn't matter. Well it does matter. Look, if you ever get a block warning, don't try to fight it, just take the advice you're given. Thanks, Rondleman!
Stuff I did.Talk. 01:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- Loafing told you that he might block you, but then you got defensive and said that the edit doesn't matter. Well it does matter. Look, if you ever get a block warning, don't try to fight it, just take the advice you're given. Thanks, Rondleman!
Support
RickTommy, you're a cool guy. Keep it real bro. High fives, — Strong Bad
French subs
Hey, RickTommy. Please don't forget about adding {{fixtranslation}} when you do subs so Meuhcoin or someone knows to look them over. Thanks, and have a good time translating! Heimstern Läufer 09:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Pretty please? — Defender1031*Talk 03:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Complaints about the new FAS format
RickTommy, has it ever occurred to you that others might genuinely prefer the new format? People aren't praising it to annoy you; they're just expressing their honest opinions, which is entirely within their rights to do. Of course, it's also in your rights to disagree with it, but your constantly complaining about people who like the new system is annoying and is quickly becoming unacceptably hostile, especially with edit summaries like this one. Please stop. Heimstern Läufer 13:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Previous edit summary
What previous edit summary? Edit summaries are for the page history first, recent changes a distant second. I realize those HRWiki committee pages are a special case, but in general you need to stop fixing doctorwho295's name on talk pages. If he wants to sign with a lowercase letter, autopipe takes care of the link, and there's nothing in our signature guidelines that says he has to sign with a capital letter. — It's dot com 05:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)