Talk:Red herrings
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with '==Any defenders of this page?== The topic doesn't seem notable to me, and it ''definitely'' needs a better commando name if it stays, because the examples on the page are not red…') |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Any defenders of this page?: Hey wait... that's MY name!) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Any defenders of this page?== | ==Any defenders of this page?== | ||
The topic doesn't seem notable to me, and it ''definitely'' needs a better commando name if it stays, because the examples on the page are not red herrings. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 17:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC) | The topic doesn't seem notable to me, and it ''definitely'' needs a better commando name if it stays, because the examples on the page are not red herrings. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 17:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I'll live up to my name, sure. IF there are more examples than just the two currently listed and IF a better name can be settled on, I think this is a fine concept for a page. TBC often make real-world references that I just don't get nor care to look up, and occasionally it turns out that something that sounds like such a reference is actually just completely made up and not a real thing at all. I would say that the page's scope would be something to the effect of "single mentions of something that sounds specific but does not exist in the real world and is never further explained in-universe", though I'm not sure how to condense that into a good page title. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 7 October 2021
Any defenders of this page?
The topic doesn't seem notable to me, and it definitely needs a better commando name if it stays, because the examples on the page are not red herrings. --Jay v.2022 (Auld lang syne) 17:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'll live up to my name, sure. IF there are more examples than just the two currently listed and IF a better name can be settled on, I think this is a fine concept for a page. TBC often make real-world references that I just don't get nor care to look up, and occasionally it turns out that something that sounds like such a reference is actually just completely made up and not a real thing at all. I would say that the page's scope would be something to the effect of "single mentions of something that sounds specific but does not exist in the real world and is never further explained in-universe", though I'm not sure how to condense that into a good page title. — Defender1031*Talk 17:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
