User:Rob/Sandbox

This page is for testing out a way around not having sub-headings appear in the TOC in STUFF.

[edit] Toons and E-mails

"I hate this computer" is probably a reference to "I liked that computer" in gimmicks.

Accept This seems to be a clear reference to me, but people keep deleting it because they don't see a connection. The joke is, of course, that Strong Bad pronounced that he liked the computer in "gimmicks" but rescinds on that statement as soon as he gets annoyed. Aurora the Homestar Coder 21:05, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Second. -- tomstiff 21:12, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wedsite may refer to Strong Bad's Website, because one of the .gif images says "World Wide Wed".

Uh, no. It may not. Decline. --ISlayedTheKerrek 03:27, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Decline. -- tomstiff 17:19, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
...In their DECLINED FUN FACTS! DECLINED FUN FACTS! CAUTION! I'M GOING ON 1 OF MY SOON-TO-BE-WORLD FAMOUS RAMPAGES! Aunt Gert may refer to SBEmail 22! Homestar may refer to Homsar! Mike Chapman saying that his brother's name is Matt may refer to Matt Chapman saying that Mike Chapman WAS HIS FRIGGIN' BROTHER! STUFF MAY REFER TO SELECT THE USABLE FUN FACTS! ME GOING ON A RAMPAGE MAY REFER TO WHEN THE THERAPIST TOLD ME TO TAKE MY PILLS! SOMEONE STOP ME!{head hits keyboard}SDRLVNIBDVMOPFHUOPGNMIDLB! 18:31, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This sort of thing is getting really old. I would appreciate it if everyone would refrain from placing their emotional outbursts on STUFF. They're fun facts, people, not heinous insults about your mothers. Aurora the Homestar Coder 18:36, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I've been against the whole Fun Fact Validation Committee thingummybob, but y'know, maybe I'm changin' my mind. -- tomstiff 18:42, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  - It's dot com was working on a fun fact revamp a while ago which would get rid of this sort of thing. We should probably think about getting that up. Aurora the Homestar Coder 18:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    - Let me make a couple of modifications, and then if it's okay with everyone, I'll put a link to it on this page. — It's dot com 19:39, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

There are 102 total words in the list [of 3-letter words], counting the two duplicates (an even 100 distinct words).

Obviously, this is true, so that's not the issue here. But is it noteworthy? — It's dot com 19:12, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Weak Accept. For people who might vaguely be interested seeing it there, but couldn't be bothered counting for themselves... phlip ^T_C 19:14, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Accept. Meh, why not? But change it to say, "There are 102 total words in the list [of 3-letter words], counting the two duplicates. That makes an even 100 distinct words." --BazookaJoe 19:55, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Accept. Shrug. And I'm the one that added it! I was curious, so I counted 'em. -- tomstiff 20:03, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)