Talk:Thy Dungeonman II
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (→David Bowie: for Trogga) |
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) m (→David Bowie: pronoun problem) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*The introductory sentence (with "talk david bowie") is really more like an extension of the walkthrough. Just as in transcripts, it's better not to have links in this area. | *The introductory sentence (with "talk david bowie") is really more like an extension of the walkthrough. Just as in transcripts, it's better not to have links in this area. | ||
*We have a long tradition of giving a sentence-or-two summary of the relevant parts of a Wikipedia article. You shouldn't ''have'' to click on the link to get a suitable explanation, especially when you would have to wade through quite a bit of information just to arrive at what we already have on our article page. | *We have a long tradition of giving a sentence-or-two summary of the relevant parts of a Wikipedia article. You shouldn't ''have'' to click on the link to get a suitable explanation, especially when you would have to wade through quite a bit of information just to arrive at what we already have on our article page. | ||
| - | *The three subbullets address the important points in an ordered, concise, and clear manner, and then | + | *The three subbullets address the important points in an ordered, concise, and clear manner, and then the last one ties in the subject matter to another H*R reference. |
[[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:05, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC) | [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:05, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:08, 23 July 2005
David Bowie
The David Bowie fact is fine the way it is. Stop deleting information from it. First of all, it has gone through the STUFF process, but even if it hadn't, it shouldn't be changed. Here's why:
- The introductory sentence (with "talk david bowie") is really more like an extension of the walkthrough. Just as in transcripts, it's better not to have links in this area.
- We have a long tradition of giving a sentence-or-two summary of the relevant parts of a Wikipedia article. You shouldn't have to click on the link to get a suitable explanation, especially when you would have to wade through quite a bit of information just to arrive at what we already have on our article page.
- The three subbullets address the important points in an ordered, concise, and clear manner, and then the last one ties in the subject matter to another H*R reference.
It's dot com 04:05, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC)
