Talk:Homestar's Shades
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(+comment re: new larger image) |
(more pictures) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::The new, larger image is nice. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 14:39, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC) | :::The new, larger image is nice. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 14:39, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC) | ||
::::Good work, Lotionman. I tried to help make the image as quality as possible without taking up too much space. We certainly accomplished this (as a team)! {{User:The Paper/sig}} 03:35, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC) | ::::Good work, Lotionman. I tried to help make the image as quality as possible without taking up too much space. We certainly accomplished this (as a team)! {{User:The Paper/sig}} 03:35, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | There are 5 examples but 4 pictures. Can someone maybe fix that?--[[User:Martin925|Martin925]] 03:07, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:07, 31 August 2005
More examples needed
We also need images of the other sunglasses, not just Dangeresque too's. — It's dot com 01:31, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Why not use the image Dot com uploaded for STUFF? —BazookaJoe 01:33, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Alright then. I'll use the one with three pairs. I'll also add the one on Main Page 3. -Lotionman 01:48, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)Lotionman
I added the new picture. -Lotionman 01:48, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)Lotionman
- Ooh, I like that 2x2 image, Lotionman. Good prize! — It's dot com 01:49, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- A tiny suggestion... do you have this image in an original larger form? Clicking on the thumbnail doesn't provide a more detailed view. — It's dot com 01:51, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- The new, larger image is nice. — It's dot com 14:39, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Good work, Lotionman. I tried to help make the image as quality as possible without taking up too much space. We certainly accomplished this (as a team)! —THE PAPER PREEEOW 03:35, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- The new, larger image is nice. — It's dot com 14:39, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)
There are 5 examples but 4 pictures. Can someone maybe fix that?--Martin925 03:07, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
