HRWiki talk:ProxyBlocks
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (reply for Stux) |
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) m (→Proxy Listing: formatting) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I had to double check, but I indeed typed in the correct range. When following the example, the IP range without the netmask makes no sense. With the netmask it makes a little bit more sense but it still makes no sense. So... a) is this correct? b) do you guys need the netmask? c) if this affects other wiki's are there other groups doing the same thing? Are they "inter-collaborating"? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 03:58, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | I had to double check, but I indeed typed in the correct range. When following the example, the IP range without the netmask makes no sense. With the netmask it makes a little bit more sense but it still makes no sense. So... a) is this correct? b) do you guys need the netmask? c) if this affects other wiki's are there other groups doing the same thing? Are they "inter-collaborating"? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 03:58, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
: What doesn't make sense about it? Looks fine to me. The netmask is unnecessary, as it's implied by the /24. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 04:00, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | : What doesn't make sense about it? Looks fine to me. The netmask is unnecessary, as it's implied by the /24. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 04:00, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
- | ::Maybe my terminology was incorrect, but the part we need is ''12.173.164.0/ 24'', with the slash and the two-digit number. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | + | ::Maybe my terminology was incorrect, but the part we need is '''12.173.164.0/ 24''', with the slash and the two-digit number. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:04, 16 November 2005
Proxy Listing
Hi Dot com, I have a question: I was doing the very first node and the netmask returned:
netmask 12.173.164.0-12.173.164.255 12.173.164.0/255.255.255.0 12.173.164.0/0.0.0.255 12.173.164.0/ 24
I had to double check, but I indeed typed in the correct range. When following the example, the IP range without the netmask makes no sense. With the netmask it makes a little bit more sense but it still makes no sense. So... a) is this correct? b) do you guys need the netmask? c) if this affects other wiki's are there other groups doing the same thing? Are they "inter-collaborating"? --Stux 03:58, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- What doesn't make sense about it? Looks fine to me. The netmask is unnecessary, as it's implied by the /24. --Jay (Gobble) 04:00, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Maybe my terminology was incorrect, but the part we need is 12.173.164.0/ 24, with the slash and the two-digit number. — It's dot com 04:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC)