HRWiki talk:Protected page

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 02:07, 27 February 2006

Suggestion: Semi-protect?

What if we also had a semi protect for pages, so only logged in members could edit, which would reduce vandalism without removing to point of a wiki. This would be helpful on pages like Strong Bad Email, which are vandalized frequently, but also edited helpfully frequently -- nintendorulez 14:58, 12 Mar 2005 (MST)

I don't think this is possible, and it would ruin the point of a wiki. →[[User:FireBird|FireBird]]

Exactly right, Firebird. -- Tom 11:56, 13 Mar 2005 (MST)

Plus, that would be completely pointless right now, seeing as annonymous editing is disabled. — _talk Bubsty _edits 18:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

problem on teh SB e-mail page

under fun facts it says "strongbad has checked 163 e-mails" it should be 136, not 163. but the page is protected.

I've unprotected the page, but I believe that is referring to the actual number of emails he has answered. In some cases, he answers more than one, such as 50 emails and spring cleaning. -- Tom 06:36, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Wrong protection

I've noticed some of the pages that are protected, even though they are obviously not compiant to these guidelines. Would a sysop unprotect them? If you need a list, I'll TRY and find them all. Bluebry 01:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

I'll take a list, thanks. -- Tom 01:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Lemme find 'em all. Bluebry 02:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

1. User:Drhaggis
2. User:Jay
3. User:Thunderbird L17/Sysops

These are all I could find, really. And um, 1) They're not high-visibility, because they're user pages 2) Not logos 3) Not Mediawiki There are the reasons for them, too. Bluebry 02:07, 27 February 2006 (UTC)