Template talk:personal-image-sig
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(test) |
(→Alternate image idea: reply) |
||
| (includes 8 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| <center>''This image is a '''[[HRWiki:Personal images|personal image]]''' in the signature of '''[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]]'''.''<br><small>Certain restrictions apply.</small></center> | | <center>''This image is a '''[[HRWiki:Personal images|personal image]]''' in the signature of '''[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]]'''.''<br><small>Certain restrictions apply.</small></center> | ||
|} | |} | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
{{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC) | {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I like that the original images match each other. They're kind of a set. Incidentally, the signature in the image on the template page is based on Matt Chapman's signature (loosely, so as not to get in trouble for using it). — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Really? That's pretty cool. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Then how about Homestarizing the whole set? We did it for FA, cleanup and stub templates. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 04:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::I'm just playing around with the idea for fun; it's fine if we stick with the current template. But here's a compilation of the image I proposed for [[Template:personal-image]] with the above signature. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 13:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | {| align="center" style="width: 80%; background-color: #f1f1de; border: 2px solid #996; padding: 5px;" | ||
| + | | [[Image:Homestar_personal_image_sig.png|100px|Personal image for signature]] | ||
| + | | <center>''This image is a '''[[HRWiki:Personal images|personal image]]''' in the signature of '''[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]]'''.''<br><small>Certain restrictions apply.</small></center> | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | :::::I like the one with only the sig. The one with both picture and sig is just too big. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 14:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::I like the original images better than any of the new suggestions. (And I'm not just saying that because I made them. Speaking objectively, I like the ones that form a set over the ones that are just reaching for H*R-related images.) — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::::I definitely agree that it's good to have the three images match each other. And hey, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 18:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 18:15, 23 August 2006
[edit] Alternate image idea
Well, not that we need to have HSR-related images for every template, but here's an idea:
| | Certain restrictions apply. |
Trey56 21:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- I like that the original images match each other. They're kind of a set. Incidentally, the signature in the image on the template page is based on Matt Chapman's signature (loosely, so as not to get in trouble for using it). — It's dot com 22:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Really? That's pretty cool.
Trey56 22:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Really? That's pretty cool.
- Then how about Homestarizing the whole set? We did it for FA, cleanup and stub templates. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 04:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm just playing around with the idea for fun; it's fine if we stick with the current template. But here's a compilation of the image I proposed for Template:personal-image with the above signature.
Trey56 13:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm just playing around with the idea for fun; it's fine if we stick with the current template. But here's a compilation of the image I proposed for Template:personal-image with the above signature.
- Then how about Homestarizing the whole set? We did it for FA, cleanup and stub templates. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 04:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
| | Certain restrictions apply. |
- I like the one with only the sig. The one with both picture and sig is just too big. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 14:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- I like the original images better than any of the new suggestions. (And I'm not just saying that because I made them. Speaking objectively, I like the ones that form a set over the ones that are just reaching for H*R-related images.) — It's dot com 15:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- I definitely agree that it's good to have the three images match each other. And hey, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Trey56 18:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- I definitely agree that it's good to have the three images match each other. And hey, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
- I like the original images better than any of the new suggestions. (And I'm not just saying that because I made them. Speaking objectively, I like the ones that form a set over the ones that are just reaching for H*R-related images.) — It's dot com 15:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- I like the one with only the sig. The one with both picture and sig is just too big. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 14:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
