Talk:Female Lappy 486
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (Merge with Lappy 486) |
|||
| (includes 1 intermediate revision) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I wouldn't know. I've never seen the movie. But if the talking computer in War Games has blonde hair and a female face, I think it can be considered a valid reference. :) <br> | I wouldn't know. I've never seen the movie. But if the talking computer in War Games has blonde hair and a female face, I think it can be considered a valid reference. :) <br> | ||
Female Lappy 486 is the first hrwiki page I've ever created. *treasures it somehow* --[[User:mathgrant|mathgrant]] | Female Lappy 486 is the first hrwiki page I've ever created. *treasures it somehow* --[[User:mathgrant|mathgrant]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Many combolations, Elizimath. ---[[User:Bellatrix|Bellatrix]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Merge with Lappy 486 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think the female persona has become established to the point that it is a true part of the Lappy. I therefore don't see the need for two pages on the subject. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 00:15, 5 October 2006
I got rid of the below:
== Quick Facts == *The Female Lappy looks to be inspired by the movie "War Games" in which a talking computer would greet and interact with its user, David.
It's not at all unique to War Games. What aboot 2001: A Space Oddysey, or, Knight Rider? Point is, a computer that talks to the user isn't a reference to any specific thing. --beanluc 14:29, 10 Jan 2005 (MST)
I wouldn't know. I've never seen the movie. But if the talking computer in War Games has blonde hair and a female face, I think it can be considered a valid reference. :)
Female Lappy 486 is the first hrwiki page I've ever created. *treasures it somehow* --mathgrant
Many combolations, Elizimath. ---Bellatrix
[edit] Merge with Lappy 486
I think the female persona has become established to the point that it is a true part of the Lappy. I therefore don't see the need for two pages on the subject. — It's dot com 00:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
