Talk:Graffiti Wall
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(reply) |
(thoughts) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::::I think they need to be separate, coz one is a [[Places|place]] and one is a [[Running Gags|gag]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] | ::::I think they need to be separate, coz one is a [[Places|place]] and one is a [[Running Gags|gag]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] | ||
:::::First of all, it'd probably be better as a phenomenon, not a place, as in 'graffiti on walls." And that would fit in nicely with just plain ol' graffiti. And I think there have been instances of places being part of an article.-[[User:LordQuackingstick|LordQuackingstick]] 22:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | :::::First of all, it'd probably be better as a phenomenon, not a place, as in 'graffiti on walls." And that would fit in nicely with just plain ol' graffiti. And I think there have been instances of places being part of an article.-[[User:LordQuackingstick|LordQuackingstick]] 22:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | I don't think it's a bad thing to have the same article discuss a gag and a location, especially when the two are so related and this article is so brief. This type of wall has been seen in two toons, a game and in the wallpapes. Come to think about it, is it really a "place" as they're not all the same wall? Anyway, not all places need articles, too, so that's something else to ponder. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:13, 22 January 2007
Do we need both this page and the graffiti page?-LordQuackingstick 21:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- This page has been here a really long time... --DorianGray
- While that is true, and should be considered, that's not a good reason not to discuss its worth. I'm thinking merging the two articles might not be a bad idea, actually. - Qermaq - (T/C)
21:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- I guess the real question is "With graffiti being a popular subject, is there something significant about it being on walls vs other mediums?" -
ISTC 21:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think they need to be separate, coz one is a place and one is a gag. --DorianGray
- First of all, it'd probably be better as a phenomenon, not a place, as in 'graffiti on walls." And that would fit in nicely with just plain ol' graffiti. And I think there have been instances of places being part of an article.-LordQuackingstick 22:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think they need to be separate, coz one is a place and one is a gag. --DorianGray
- I guess the real question is "With graffiti being a popular subject, is there something significant about it being on walls vs other mediums?" -
- While that is true, and should be considered, that's not a good reason not to discuss its worth. I'm thinking merging the two articles might not be a bad idea, actually. - Qermaq - (T/C)
I don't think it's a bad thing to have the same article discuss a gag and a location, especially when the two are so related and this article is so brief. This type of wall has been seen in two toons, a game and in the wallpapes. Come to think about it, is it really a "place" as they're not all the same wall? Anyway, not all places need articles, too, so that's something else to ponder. - Qermaq - (T/C) 
22:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
