Template talk:storenav
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) m (fix) |
(→Position of this template on the subpages: replying to old comment) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I really think anyone looking to use this template would appreciate being at the top, rather than the bottom, of the subpages, especially because some of them are quite lengthy. These aren't articles, they're tables of information; the navigation should therefore be in the most practical spot for someone looking for the links. (I think the same about the [[Sightings]] and [[Strong Bad Email]] subpages, but that's for other talk pages, perhaps.) — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | I really think anyone looking to use this template would appreciate being at the top, rather than the bottom, of the subpages, especially because some of them are quite lengthy. These aren't articles, they're tables of information; the navigation should therefore be in the most practical spot for someone looking for the links. (I think the same about the [[Sightings]] and [[Strong Bad Email]] subpages, but that's for other talk pages, perhaps.) — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Makes sense and I agree for sightings, so I'll go ahead and fix that. Of course SBE's have been taken care of. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 15:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :''Further discussion of the [[Sightings]] relocation will proceed [[Talk:Sightings#Template_Relocation|here]].'' | ||
Current revision as of 15:41, 22 March 2007
[edit] Position of this template on the subpages
I really think anyone looking to use this template would appreciate being at the top, rather than the bottom, of the subpages, especially because some of them are quite lengthy. These aren't articles, they're tables of information; the navigation should therefore be in the most practical spot for someone looking for the links. (I think the same about the Sightings and Strong Bad Email subpages, but that's for other talk pages, perhaps.) — It's dot com 01:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Makes sense and I agree for sightings, so I'll go ahead and fix that. Of course SBE's have been taken care of. --Stux 15:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
