Template talk:Old-Timey
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jangles5150 (Talk | contribs) |
(restoring old discussions) |
||
| (includes 7 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | Do we really need this? there are only like, 6 old-timey cartoons, and | + | ==17 May 2006== |
| + | What is wrong with this template? | ||
| + | :Check [[HRWiki:Da Basement/Archive3#Template Overload|here]] for all the info on why it was deleted before. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==11 April 2007== | ||
| + | Do we really need this? there are only like, 6 old-timey cartoons, and I'm sure that they all link to each other. --[[User:Jangles5150|Jangles5150]] ([[User_talk:Jangles5150|words]]+[[Special:Contributions/Jangles5150|helps]]) 23:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Yes we do. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} | ||
| + | ::I think there used to be an Old-Timey template, but it was deleted because it was said to be unnecessary. Here's the link to the [[HRWiki:Da Basement/Archive3#Template Overload|discussion]]. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 23:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::O.K then. I don't care. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Exactly. It was, and it, unnececary to have. --[[User:Jangles5150|Jangles5150]] ([[User_talk:Jangles5150|words]]+[[Special:Contributions/Jangles5150|helps]]) 23:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 23:51, 11 April 2007
[edit] 17 May 2006
What is wrong with this template?
- Check here for all the info on why it was deleted before. --DorianGray
[edit] 11 April 2007
Do we really need this? there are only like, 6 old-timey cartoons, and I'm sure that they all link to each other. --Jangles5150 (words+helps) 23:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes we do.
Sam the Man 
- I think there used to be an Old-Timey template, but it was deleted because it was said to be unnecessary. Here's the link to the discussion. — Has Matt? (talk) 23:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- O.K then. I don't care. Sam the Man
- O.K then. I don't care.
- I think there used to be an Old-Timey template, but it was deleted because it was said to be unnecessary. Here's the link to the discussion. — Has Matt? (talk) 23:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Exactly. It was, and it, unnececary to have. --Jangles5150 (words+helps) 23:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
