Talk:You Reek-A!
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Delete) |
(removed {{ttbd}} and added note) |
||
| (includes 3 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | |||
==Delete== | ==Delete== | ||
I'm not sure if this article is needed. There's nothing much we can say about it. All this is already mentioned on [[Store T-Shirts]] and [[underlings]] anyway. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | I'm not sure if this article is needed. There's nothing much we can say about it. All this is already mentioned on [[Store T-Shirts]] and [[underlings]] anyway. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
:Yeah, halfway during editing, I realized it was not needed. I put the <nowiki>{{tbd}}</nowiki> template in, and it was already edited. This page was added by an unknown user. It is also a little biased, as he/she said "hilariously funny". --{{User:Techgeekmbg/sig}} 18:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | :Yeah, halfway during editing, I realized it was not needed. I put the <nowiki>{{tbd}}</nowiki> template in, and it was already edited. This page was added by an unknown user. It is also a little biased, as he/she said "hilariously funny". --{{User:Techgeekmbg/sig}} 18:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
::The phrase was "quite hilarious" to be precise. Which is incredibly inaccurate. "Disturbingly amusing" is much more accurate for me. Anyway, I don't think a small joke merits its own article, even if it does become a Store T-Shirt. We didn't give "Stink's Reach" or "Dartmouth" their own articles, which is why this should be deleted. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | ::The phrase was "quite hilarious" to be precise. Which is incredibly inaccurate. "Disturbingly amusing" is much more accurate for me. Anyway, I don't think a small joke merits its own article, even if it does become a Store T-Shirt. We didn't give "Stink's Reach" or "Dartmouth" their own articles, which is why this should be deleted. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Think we should follow suit of [[You Reek-A! Shirt]] and redirect it to [[T-Shirts]] or summat. Maybe, since people appear to like the word so much, we could also put it in the [[Glossary]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 18:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Yeah, '''redirect to [[T-Shirts]]'''. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 18:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::DorianGray is right: we've had this discussion [[Talk:You Reek-A! shirt|before]]. '''redirect'''{{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Okay, the page has been replaced with a redirect to [[T-Shirts]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 19:31, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 19:31, 17 June 2007
[edit] Delete
I'm not sure if this article is needed. There's nothing much we can say about it. All this is already mentioned on Store T-Shirts and underlings anyway. – The Chort 18:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, halfway during editing, I realized it was not needed. I put the {{tbd}} template in, and it was already edited. This page was added by an unknown user. It is also a little biased, as he/she said "hilariously funny". --The Goblin!!
18:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- The phrase was "quite hilarious" to be precise. Which is incredibly inaccurate. "Disturbingly amusing" is much more accurate for me. Anyway, I don't think a small joke merits its own article, even if it does become a Store T-Shirt. We didn't give "Stink's Reach" or "Dartmouth" their own articles, which is why this should be deleted. – The Chort 18:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Think we should follow suit of You Reek-A! Shirt and redirect it to T-Shirts or summat. Maybe, since people appear to like the word so much, we could also put it in the Glossary. --DorianGray 18:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- The phrase was "quite hilarious" to be precise. Which is incredibly inaccurate. "Disturbingly amusing" is much more accurate for me. Anyway, I don't think a small joke merits its own article, even if it does become a Store T-Shirt. We didn't give "Stink's Reach" or "Dartmouth" their own articles, which is why this should be deleted. – The Chort 18:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
