Talk:The Cheatbot
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Question) |
|||
| (includes 16 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | Why can't The Cheatbot be its own character? | + | Why can't The Cheatbot be its own character? Much more subtle variations of current characters have become their own characters. Also, Strong Bad seems to have given it a name; that should definitely warrant its own character. |
| + | :It's The Cheat in a bucket. Wow. See [[The Cheat Other Costumes]]. - {{User:Joshua/sig}} 21:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| - | + | Maybe it should, i'm not exactly sure, but it does deserve a page of its own. I just created that like 10 minutes ago...By the way who uploaded the pic of the Cheatbot on the page? I was going to do that. | |
| + | {{User:ArchiveMaker/sig}} | ||
| + | :According to [[:Image:The_Cheat-Bot.PNG|the image info]], it was Joshua, and it was way back in January. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 11:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == User == | ||
| + | |||
| + | There's a user called [[User:Dacheatbot]] should he change it? [[User:69.205.180.72|69.205.180.72]] 14:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :No, it's OK to have the name of a minor character (and frankly, The Cheatbot is more a character variation than a character, anyway). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::What about me now? Oh just so you know, There is a user called [[User talk:Homestar Runner|Homestar Runner]] {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 16:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Dacheatbot your right if i recall there is a rule about having a MAIN character for a user name. Good point [[User:Sherlockrunner|Sherlockrunner]] 1 December 2006 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Merge== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Merge this page with [[The Cheat]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I've removed the TBC template. Please when suggesting an article for deletion state you name/username/sign as an IP and also state your reasons for deleting the article. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Question== | ||
| + | should it be noted that the light bulbs/globes work when there is no wire or battery? the only way they would work is if they were solar powered. [[User:Foogs|Mr. "UB making" Foogs.Vote now on UBs!]] 16:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Well, I don't see any solar cell on it. I guess it either has a battery built in or, since these lights were never switched on in [[technology]], it probably doesn't need a power supply at all. {{User:The Commander IN COMMAND/sig}} 16:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 16:27, 29 June 2007
Why can't The Cheatbot be its own character? Much more subtle variations of current characters have become their own characters. Also, Strong Bad seems to have given it a name; that should definitely warrant its own character.
- It's The Cheat in a bucket. Wow. See The Cheat Other Costumes. - Joshua 21:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Maybe it should, i'm not exactly sure, but it does deserve a page of its own. I just created that like 10 minutes ago...By the way who uploaded the pic of the Cheatbot on the page? I was going to do that.
A to the M: Fallen Star 
- According to the image info, it was Joshua, and it was way back in January. - Qermaq - (T/C)
11:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User
There's a user called User:Dacheatbot should he change it? 69.205.180.72 14:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- No, it's OK to have the name of a minor character (and frankly, The Cheatbot is more a character variation than a character, anyway). Heimstern Läufer
15:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- What about me now? Oh just so you know, There is a user called Homestar Runner --Dacheatbot · Communicate 16:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Dacheatbot your right if i recall there is a rule about having a MAIN character for a user name. Good point Sherlockrunner 1 December 2006
- What about me now? Oh just so you know, There is a user called Homestar Runner --Dacheatbot · Communicate 16:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
Merge this page with The Cheat.
- I've removed the TBC template. Please when suggesting an article for deletion state you name/username/sign as an IP and also state your reasons for deleting the article. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 05:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Question
should it be noted that the light bulbs/globes work when there is no wire or battery? the only way they would work is if they were solar powered. Mr. "UB making" Foogs.Vote now on UBs! 16:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I don't see any solar cell on it. I guess it either has a battery built in or, since these lights were never switched on in technology, it probably doesn't need a power supply at all. TCIC (Talk to me / Stuff I did) 16:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
