Category talk:Articles for Discussion

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(+more)
(Indenting differently so it's clear to whom I'm replying)
Line 1: Line 1:
If the first 2 discussions were too short or had too few participants, would it still be stupid to tag an article 3 times for deletion? [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 22:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
If the first 2 discussions were too short or had too few participants, would it still be stupid to tag an article 3 times for deletion? [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 22:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
:It would certainly be a bad idea to tag an article for deletion only a few weeks after it was just discussed, if that's what you're thinking. One where the discussion has been closed for quite some time, maybe, but if you're still thinking of [[Modestly Hot Homsar]], yes, bad idea. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 22:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
:It would certainly be a bad idea to tag an article for deletion only a few weeks after it was just discussed, if that's what you're thinking. One where the discussion has been closed for quite some time, maybe, but if you're still thinking of [[Modestly Hot Homsar]], yes, bad idea. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 22:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
-
::I assume you're talking about [[Modestly Hot Homsar]]. I don't if you've seen [[Different Town Character Variations]], but why not work on that page instead of reopening the TBD discussion on [[Modestly Hot Homsar]]? People's opinions might be affected by the success or failure of that page. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
+
 
 +
:I assume you're talking about [[Modestly Hot Homsar]]. I don't if you've seen [[Different Town Character Variations]], but why not work on that page instead of reopening the TBD discussion on [[Modestly Hot Homsar]]? People's opinions might be affected by the success or failure of that page. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:07, 3 October 2007

If the first 2 discussions were too short or had too few participants, would it still be stupid to tag an article 3 times for deletion? Bad Bad Guy 22:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

It would certainly be a bad idea to tag an article for deletion only a few weeks after it was just discussed, if that's what you're thinking. One where the discussion has been closed for quite some time, maybe, but if you're still thinking of Modestly Hot Homsar, yes, bad idea. Heimstern Läufer 22:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I assume you're talking about Modestly Hot Homsar. I don't if you've seen Different Town Character Variations, but why not work on that page instead of reopening the TBD discussion on Modestly Hot Homsar? People's opinions might be affected by the success or failure of that page. Trey56 22:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools