Template talk:no license from license selector
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
ACupOfCoffee (Talk | contribs) (→Blah?) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Um, what exactly is this? — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 04:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | Um, what exactly is this? — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 04:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
:That's a good question. Apparently I created it, and ''I'' don't know what it is. It seems to be unused so I suppose it can be deleted. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 04:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | :That's a good question. Apparently I created it, and ''I'' don't know what it is. It seems to be unused so I suppose it can be deleted. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 04:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::It's used in [[MediaWiki:Licenses]] (which contains the list of licenses for the [[Special:Upload]] list) to put {{tl|don't know}} and {{tl|some website}} on images, if that's selected... Looking at the history, it seems it was originally a workaround to put both the more specific "don't know"/"some website" template, and also {{tl|no license}} on the same image... since Special:Upload will only put on one template... but that got removed. It seems rather useless, as it stands right now... we could either put {{tl|no license}} back on, or get rid of it entirely and put {{tl|don't know}} and {{tl|some website}} directly onto <[[MediaWiki:Licenses|licenses]]>. Or just leave it as it is, since it's not really hurting anything. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 04:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:58, 17 November 2007
Blah?
Um, what exactly is this? — Sam
Fisher (Come in, Lambert.) 04:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- That's a good question. Apparently I created it, and I don't know what it is. It seems to be unused so I suppose it can be deleted. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 04:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's used in MediaWiki:Licenses (which contains the list of licenses for the Special:Upload list) to put {{don't know}} and {{some website}} on images, if that's selected... Looking at the history, it seems it was originally a workaround to put both the more specific "don't know"/"some website" template, and also {{no license}} on the same image... since Special:Upload will only put on one template... but that got removed. It seems rather useless, as it stands right now... we could either put {{no license}} back on, or get rid of it entirely and put {{don't know}} and {{some website}} directly onto <licenses>. Or just leave it as it is, since it's not really hurting anything. --phlip TC 04:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
