Talk:Strong Bad Email Sender's Subject

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(thumbs-up)
(Reply)
 
(includes 1 intermediate revision)
Line 1: Line 1:
Just an idea I had... should we keep it? If so, what should we sort it by... chronological? alphabetical? similarity to email title? I tried the third, but it was hard to make it seem objective... {{User:Phlip/sig}} 05:01, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Just an idea I had... should we keep it? If so, what should we sort it by... chronological? alphabetical? similarity to email title? I tried the third, but it was hard to make it seem objective... {{User:Phlip/sig}} 05:01, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
:I like it; chronological sounds good. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 12:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
:I like it; chronological sounds good. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 12:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 +
 +
''All emails shown on the [[Lappy 486]] also show the '''subject''' the sender used.''<br>
 +
Actually, it is possible that TBC changed some of the subject lines around a bit. When I sent [[slumber party]], I put the subject as simply "slumber party", but it was expanded to "slumber parties" in the toon. --[[User:ThomasO|ThomasO]] 22:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 +
:Yeah, but it's simpler to just say what's already there. Trying to explain that sometimes it's not precise would be too many extra words for too little interest. Besides, we can't verify the vast majority of them as being changed or not anyway. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 22:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Current revision as of 22:47, 5 February 2008

Just an idea I had... should we keep it? If so, what should we sort it by... chronological? alphabetical? similarity to email title? I tried the third, but it was hard to make it seem objective... --phlip TC 05:01, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

I like it; chronological sounds good. LePorello / T / C 12:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

All emails shown on the Lappy 486 also show the subject the sender used.
Actually, it is possible that TBC changed some of the subject lines around a bit. When I sent slumber party, I put the subject as simply "slumber party", but it was expanded to "slumber parties" in the toon. --ThomasO 22:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, but it's simpler to just say what's already there. Trying to explain that sometimes it's not precise would be too many extra words for too little interest. Besides, we can't verify the vast majority of them as being changed or not anyway. --DorianGray 22:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools