Talk:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Bad Bad Guy (Talk | contribs) ({{tbd}} and reply) |
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (→Inclusion: 42 is a coincidence) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
'''Edit conflicted!''' I don't know if all of these instances of the number 42 are references to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. We have no proof that they are, and there is no point in crating an article when all but one of its appearances are speculations. We could possibly create an article on the number [[42]] though. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 22:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | '''Edit conflicted!''' I don't know if all of these instances of the number 42 are references to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. We have no proof that they are, and there is no point in crating an article when all but one of its appearances are speculations. We could possibly create an article on the number [[42]] though. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 22:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I was thinking of making a similar suggestion. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 22:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | :I was thinking of making a similar suggestion. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 22:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::I think the mentions of the number 42 are coincidences (and thus shouldn't count for this article). (The number 42 doesn't need its own article either). — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:29, 31 December 2008
The Green Guy
The green guy only appears on the covers of a specific edition (or editions) of the book. Unfortunately, I've not been able to determine which edition does have it (only several editions that don't) - my search fu is weak. It might be an idea to make a mention of which edition/s has/have it. --Belthazar 22:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Inclusion
Edit conflicted! I don't know if all of these instances of the number 42 are references to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. We have no proof that they are, and there is no point in crating an article when all but one of its appearances are speculations. We could possibly create an article on the number 42 though. Homestar-Winner (talk) 22:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I was thinking of making a similar suggestion.
BBG 22:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I think the mentions of the number 42 are coincidences (and thus shouldn't count for this article). (The number 42 doesn't need its own article either). — It's dot com 23:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)