Talk:Oatmeal

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Not enough: i strongly disagree.)
(Not enough: reply)
Line 4: Line 4:
Those three appearances are not enough for such a general food item. And they aren't even related in any way. The reference in [[buried]] is also a stretch, because it's a joke more about the person, then the food. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 10:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Those three appearances are not enough for such a general food item. And they aren't even related in any way. The reference in [[buried]] is also a stretch, because it's a joke more about the person, then the food. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 10:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
:I strongly disagree. Actually, when I saw this page, I was pleasantly surprised that they were actually used in non-food ways and that this wasn't just another pointless list of items page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
:I strongly disagree. Actually, when I saw this page, I was pleasantly surprised that they were actually used in non-food ways and that this wasn't just another pointless list of items page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
::I agree that the uses for oatmeal are original. But it's still not enough for a whole page. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 12:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:39, 27 May 2010


Not enough

Those three appearances are not enough for such a general food item. And they aren't even related in any way. The reference in buried is also a stretch, because it's a joke more about the person, then the food. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 10:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

I strongly disagree. Actually, when I saw this page, I was pleasantly surprised that they were actually used in non-food ways and that this wasn't just another pointless list of items page. — Defender1031*Talk 11:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
I agree that the uses for oatmeal are original. But it's still not enough for a whole page. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 12:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools