Talk:Oatmeal
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Not enough: i strongly disagree.) |
(→Not enough: reply) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Those three appearances are not enough for such a general food item. And they aren't even related in any way. The reference in [[buried]] is also a stretch, because it's a joke more about the person, then the food. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 10:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC) | Those three appearances are not enough for such a general food item. And they aren't even related in any way. The reference in [[buried]] is also a stretch, because it's a joke more about the person, then the food. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 10:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I strongly disagree. Actually, when I saw this page, I was pleasantly surprised that they were actually used in non-food ways and that this wasn't just another pointless list of items page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC) | :I strongly disagree. Actually, when I saw this page, I was pleasantly surprised that they were actually used in non-food ways and that this wasn't just another pointless list of items page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::I agree that the uses for oatmeal are original. But it's still not enough for a whole page. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 12:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:39, 27 May 2010
Not enough
Those three appearances are not enough for such a general food item. And they aren't even related in any way. The reference in buried is also a stretch, because it's a joke more about the person, then the food. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 10:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree. Actually, when I saw this page, I was pleasantly surprised that they were actually used in non-food ways and that this wasn't just another pointless list of items page. — Defender1031*Talk 11:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that the uses for oatmeal are original. But it's still not enough for a whole page. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 12:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)