HRWiki talk:Users
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (I see no reason to delete) |
(→Needed?: red links = ugly) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I don't see the need to fix ''every'' red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for [[HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users]]. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think [[Special:ListGroupRights]] would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say '''delete both'''. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC) | I don't see the need to fix ''every'' red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for [[HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users]]. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think [[Special:ListGroupRights]] would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say '''delete both'''. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC) | :The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:10, 26 January 2011
Needed?
I don't see the need to fix every red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think Special:ListGroupRights would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say delete both. —Soiled Bargains (talk|ctrb) 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — It's dot com 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say keep. Heimstern Läufer
11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say keep. Heimstern Läufer
