Talk:Monopoly Money
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Reason for TBD.) |
DorianGray (Talk | contribs) (Go to deletion. Go directly to deletion. Do not pass go, do not make 200 edits.) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
#While I'll grant that Weekly Fanstuff, unlike ordinary fanstuff, has been vetted by TBC, it's still not a reference they themselves made. | #While I'll grant that Weekly Fanstuff, unlike ordinary fanstuff, has been vetted by TBC, it's still not a reference they themselves made. | ||
All these facts together lead me to conclude that this article doesn't have enough of a leg to stand on and should be bankrupted... err, deleted. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 10:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC) | All these facts together lead me to conclude that this article doesn't have enough of a leg to stand on and should be bankrupted... err, deleted. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 10:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | :I concur with Heimstern. I have some non-Monopoly Monopoly money myself. None of these really stand out as an actual reference, and the article should be deleted. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 10:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:32, 22 March 2011
I'm unconvinced about several appearances in this article.
- Two of these are about "Monopoly money", which is sometimes used as a term for just any old non-legal tender (see the Wikipedia article), whether it comes from the game Monopoly or not.
- The mayor in Teen Girl Squad is a "striking resemblance", not a clear reference (to me, he just looks like any stereotypical old statesman).
- While I'll grant that Weekly Fanstuff, unlike ordinary fanstuff, has been vetted by TBC, it's still not a reference they themselves made.
All these facts together lead me to conclude that this article doesn't have enough of a leg to stand on and should be bankrupted... err, deleted. Heimstern Läufer 10:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- I concur with Heimstern. I have some non-Monopoly Monopoly money myself. None of these really stand out as an actual reference, and the article should be deleted. --DorianGray 10:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC)