Talk:2002
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Camwoodstock (Talk | contribs) (Created page with '2002 has became a running gag (mostly post-hiatus, but it has been used before it as early as retirement) to describe H*R's age in stuff like Sbemail206 or the surprise a…') |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (sig length restrictions appky) |
||
| (includes 3 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I mean, [[1987]] and [[1989]] get their own pages. Why not 2002? | I mean, [[1987]] and [[1989]] get their own pages. Why not 2002? | ||
| - | --[[User:Camwoodstock| | + | --[[User:Camwoodstock|Camwoodstock]] 14:42, 3 December 2016 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | :[[References to Years in Which Toons Were Released]]. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I know of that at page's existence, but it seems strange that 2002 in particular is used particularly frequently to describe the site's age. --[[User:Camwoodstock|Camwoodstock]] 01:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 13:21, 4 December 2016
2002 has became a running gag (mostly post-hiatus, but it has been used before it as early as retirement) to describe H*R's age in stuff like Sbemail206 or the surprise appearance from W00tstock - 18 Jul 2013. Think that should be a page?
I mean, 1987 and 1989 get their own pages. Why not 2002?
--Camwoodstock 14:42, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- References to Years in Which Toons Were Released. RickTommy (edits) 23:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- I know of that at page's existence, but it seems strange that 2002 in particular is used particularly frequently to describe the site's age. --Camwoodstock 01:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
