Talk:autobiography
From Homestar Runner Wiki
BazookaJoe (Talk | contribs) (reply for FireBird) |
m (Reply for BazookaJoe.) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::Aye, but if we put in ''{types "dumpus" in place of Strong Sad}'' and remove ''{while saying this, he types "No misspellings + good idea + made fun of dumpus = SOLID!!"}'', shouldn't we then have to also put in ''{types "+ good idea"}'', ''{types "= SOLID!!"}'' where necessary? Wouldn't it be easier to only have ''{...he types "No misspellings + good idea..."}''? -[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 16:21, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ::Aye, but if we put in ''{types "dumpus" in place of Strong Sad}'' and remove ''{while saying this, he types "No misspellings + good idea + made fun of dumpus = SOLID!!"}'', shouldn't we then have to also put in ''{types "+ good idea"}'', ''{types "= SOLID!!"}'' where necessary? Wouldn't it be easier to only have ''{...he types "No misspellings + good idea..."}''? -[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 16:21, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::Oh, wait. I see where you're coming from. That idea is much better, yes. {{User:FireBird/sig}} 16:23, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:23, 4 June 2005
The "back" link works like an inch left of the word back. Is this worth noting and does it happen anywhere else? --ninja pirate 17:37, 2 Dec 2004 (MST)
dumpus note
STRONG BAD: Wait a minute... lemme check something... {runs spellchecka.exe, it says "0 spelling errors found!"} No way! {typing} No misspellings, a good idea, made fun of Strong Sad {types "dumpus" in place of Strong Sad} ... don't get me wrong, Dan, I mean, I wanna make fun of you but, uh, you've put together a solid email! {while saying this, he types "No misspellings + good idea + made fun of dumpus = SOLID!!"}
---
I removed the {types "dumpus" in place of Strong Sad} because that note is already taken care of in {while saying this, he types "No misspellings + good idea + made fun of dumpus = SOLID!!"}. Is there a reason why you kept this, HR Coder? --BazookaJoe 16:11, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- She probably didn't notice the bottom part. Personally I think we should reword it- keep the "{types "dumpus" in place of Strong Sad} and remove this part from the "{No misspellings + good idea...}" part. —FireBird|Talk 16:14, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Aye, but if we put in {types "dumpus" in place of Strong Sad} and remove {while saying this, he types "No misspellings + good idea + made fun of dumpus = SOLID!!"}, shouldn't we then have to also put in {types "+ good idea"}, {types "= SOLID!!"} where necessary? Wouldn't it be easier to only have {...he types "No misspellings + good idea..."}? -BazookaJoe 16:21, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)