Talk:Names ending in -erson

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Morkleson?)
 
(includes 17 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
Why is this marked for deletion? Seems like a valid running gag to me. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 20:46, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Why is this marked for deletion? Seems like a valid running gag to me. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 20:46, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:Second {{User:Some HSR themed username/sig}} 21:01, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:Second {{User:Some HSR themed username/sig}} 21:01, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 +
:'''Third'''
 +
:Forth! This seems reasonable to me-Amar
It's not a running gag, it's a vague, not-meant-to-be noticed thing. The Brothers Chaps probably just put -erson after stuff when they want a last name. nothing to get worked up about.
It's not a running gag, it's a vague, not-meant-to-be noticed thing. The Brothers Chaps probably just put -erson after stuff when they want a last name. nothing to get worked up about.
-[[User: Tapd260]]
-[[User: Tapd260]]
 +
 +
:Says the guy that wants a separate page for Professor Tor Coolguy. I say keep it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:03, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
:This running gag reminds me a lot of [[Dan]]. It seems that TBC love to reuse names. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 21:07, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Although I think this should stay, I feel a name change is in order. Just plain ole' "-erson" seems fine with me. {{User:FireBird/sig}} 15:41, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::Meh, I kind of like the current page title. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:47, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
::::Then why not change [[Dan]] to "Names with Dan in them"? {{User:FireBird/sig}} 16:23, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::::That's a good point. I have no objections to changing the title to your suggestion (although there's ''still'' something I don't quite like about plain "-erson", but I can't put my finger on what it is). — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:30, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
I think "Names ending in -erson" is a fine official sounding name for this article. '''Keep''' [[User:Drhaggis|<nowiki></nowiki>]]- [[User:Drhaggis|Dr Haggis]] - [[User talk: Drhaggis|Talk]] 21:45, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
I don't think this should be deleted. I think that(insert what Homestar Coder mentioned way above at the very tip-top of the page here). --[[User:Darklinkskywalker|Darklinkskywalker]] 22:10, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Move. ==
 +
 +
Shouldn't this be moved to just "-erson"? It seems like a long title for the sake of having a long title, because - unlike some others - the point of this article could be said in a much shorter way without losing clarity. - {{User:Kookykman/sig}}
 +
 +
== Stub'd? ==
 +
 +
Why is this a stub? It seems good enough to me. I don't know what else you can say about a topic like this one. Anyone else agree with me? {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 16:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Ogg Oggerson ==
 +
 +
Does anyone think that Ogg Oggerson relates to the .ogg audio/video file? Or is it just a coincidence? {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}
 +
:More than likely a coincidence. "Og" is a caveman cliché. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
==Morkleson?==
 +
Does "Morkleson" of recent [[parenting|sbemail]] author "Mike Morkleson" really count? It's a name ending in -eson, not -erson! ----[[User:Jeffjman|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman|Ma]][[Special:Contributions/Jeffjman|n]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png|23px]] 11:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Current revision as of 11:19, 13 October 2022

Why is this marked for deletion? Seems like a valid running gag to me. Homestar Coderhomestar-coder-sig.gif 20:46, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Second small_logo.pngUsername-talk 21:01, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Third
Forth! This seems reasonable to me-Amar

It's not a running gag, it's a vague, not-meant-to-be noticed thing. The Brothers Chaps probably just put -erson after stuff when they want a last name. nothing to get worked up about. -User: Tapd260

Says the guy that wants a separate page for Professor Tor Coolguy. I say keep it. --Jay (Gobble) 21:03, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
This running gag reminds me a lot of Dan. It seems that TBC love to reuse names. Homestar Coderhomestar-coder-sig.gif 21:07, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Although I think this should stay, I feel a name change is in order. Just plain ole' "-erson" seems fine with me. —FireBird|Talk 15:41, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Meh, I kind of like the current page title. — It's dot com 15:47, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Then why not change Dan to "Names with Dan in them"? —FireBird|Talk 16:23, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
That's a good point. I have no objections to changing the title to your suggestion (although there's still something I don't quite like about plain "-erson", but I can't put my finger on what it is). — It's dot com 16:30, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I think "Names ending in -erson" is a fine official sounding name for this article. Keep - Dr Haggis - Talk 21:45, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I don't think this should be deleted. I think that(insert what Homestar Coder mentioned way above at the very tip-top of the page here). --Darklinkskywalker 22:10, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Move.

Shouldn't this be moved to just "-erson"? It seems like a long title for the sake of having a long title, because - unlike some others - the point of this article could be said in a much shorter way without losing clarity. - KookykmanImage:kookysig.gif(t)(c)(r)

[edit] Stub'd?

Why is this a stub? It seems good enough to me. I don't know what else you can say about a topic like this one. Anyone else agree with me? Has Matt? (talk) 16:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ogg Oggerson

Does anyone think that Ogg Oggerson relates to the .ogg audio/video file? Or is it just a coincidence? MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif

More than likely a coincidence. "Og" is a caveman cliché. --DorianGray 21:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Morkleson?

Does "Morkleson" of recent sbemail author "Mike Morkleson" really count? It's a name ending in -eson, not -erson! ----J∃ffJMan 11:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)