HRWiki talk:Protected page

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Suggestion: Semi-protect?)
(Wrong protection)
Line 13: Line 13:
:I've unprotected the page, but I believe that is referring to the actual number of emails he has answered.  In some cases, he answers more than one, such as [[50 emails]] and [[spring cleaning]].[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]]  --  [[User:Tom|Tom]] 06:36, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
:I've unprotected the page, but I believe that is referring to the actual number of emails he has answered.  In some cases, he answers more than one, such as [[50 emails]] and [[spring cleaning]].[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]]  --  [[User:Tom|Tom]] 06:36, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Wrong protection ==
 +
 +
I've noticed some of the pages that are protected, even though they are obviously not compiant to these guidelines. Would a sysop unprotect them? If you need a list, I'll TRY and find them all. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 01:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:57, 27 February 2006

Suggestion: Semi-protect?

What if we also had a semi protect for pages, so only logged in members could edit, which would reduce vandalism without removing to point of a wiki. This would be helpful on pages like Strong Bad Email, which are vandalized frequently, but also edited helpfully frequently -- nintendorulez 14:58, 12 Mar 2005 (MST)

I don't think this is possible, and it would ruin the point of a wiki. →[[User:FireBird|FireBird]]
Exactly right, Firebird. -- Tom 11:56, 13 Mar 2005 (MST)
Plus, that would be completely pointless right now, seeing as annonymous editing is disabled. — talk Bubsty edits 18:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

problem on teh SB e-mail page

under fun facts it says "strongbad has checked 163 e-mails" it should be 136, not 163. but the page is protected.

I've unprotected the page, but I believe that is referring to the actual number of emails he has answered. In some cases, he answers more than one, such as 50 emails and spring cleaning. -- Tom 06:36, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Wrong protection

I've noticed some of the pages that are protected, even though they are obviously not compiant to these guidelines. Would a sysop unprotect them? If you need a list, I'll TRY and find them all. Bluebry 01:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools