HRWiki talk:Protected page
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (→Wrong protection: Reply for Bluebry muffin.) |
(→Wrong protection) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:I'll take a list, thanks. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 01:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | :I'll take a list, thanks. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 01:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Lemme find 'em all. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 02:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:00, 27 February 2006
Suggestion: Semi-protect?
What if we also had a semi protect for pages, so only logged in members could edit, which would reduce vandalism without removing to point of a wiki. This would be helpful on pages like Strong Bad Email, which are vandalized frequently, but also edited helpfully frequently -- nintendorulez 14:58, 12 Mar 2005 (MST)
- I don't think this is possible, and it would ruin the point of a wiki. →[[User:FireBird|FireBird]]
problem on teh SB e-mail page
under fun facts it says "strongbad has checked 163 e-mails" it should be 136, not 163. but the page is protected.
- I've unprotected the page, but I believe that is referring to the actual number of emails he has answered. In some cases, he answers more than one, such as 50 emails and spring cleaning. -- Tom 06:36, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Wrong protection
I've noticed some of the pages that are protected, even though they are obviously not compiant to these guidelines. Would a sysop unprotect them? If you need a list, I'll TRY and find them all. Bluebry 01:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'll take a list, thanks. -- Tom 01:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- Lemme find 'em all. Bluebry 02:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)