Talk:Bubs's Napkins
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(reply) |
BazookaJoe (Talk | contribs) (i don't) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I doubt this item would have any more real a name than this. While it does not pass the "three appearance" rule, I think it's unique enough (and funny enough) to merit a page. This seems like just the sort of thing TBC would revisit. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | :I doubt this item would have any more real a name than this. While it does not pass the "three appearance" rule, I think it's unique enough (and funny enough) to merit a page. This seems like just the sort of thing TBC would revisit. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
::I don't believe an article about napkins with only two appearances merits a page. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 00:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | ::I don't believe an article about napkins with only two appearances merits a page. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 00:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::This isn't a running gag yet, nor even an inside joke. It can't be a worthwhile item article; there isn't even a picture of the napkins. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 00:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:49, 14 November 2006
Is that the real name? If so, does this really garner an article of it's own? --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 00:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I doubt this item would have any more real a name than this. While it does not pass the "three appearance" rule, I think it's unique enough (and funny enough) to merit a page. This seems like just the sort of thing TBC would revisit. - Qermaq - (T/C)
00:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't believe an article about napkins with only two appearances merits a page. — Lapper (talk) 00:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- This isn't a running gag yet, nor even an inside joke. It can't be a worthwhile item article; there isn't even a picture of the napkins. —BazookaJoe 00:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't believe an article about napkins with only two appearances merits a page. — Lapper (talk) 00:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)