Talk:Bubs's Napkins

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(reply)
(i don't)
Line 2: Line 2:
:I doubt this item would have any more real a name than this. While it does not pass the "three appearance" rule, I think it's unique enough (and funny enough) to merit a page. This seems like just the sort of thing TBC would revisit. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
:I doubt this item would have any more real a name than this. While it does not pass the "three appearance" rule, I think it's unique enough (and funny enough) to merit a page. This seems like just the sort of thing TBC would revisit. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
::I don't believe an article about napkins with only two appearances merits a page. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 00:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
::I don't believe an article about napkins with only two appearances merits a page. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 00:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 +
:::This isn't a running gag yet, nor even an inside joke. It can't be a worthwhile item article; there isn't even a picture of the napkins. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 00:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:49, 14 November 2006

Is that the real name? If so, does this really garner an article of it's own? --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 00:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I doubt this item would have any more real a name than this. While it does not pass the "three appearance" rule, I think it's unique enough (and funny enough) to merit a page. This seems like just the sort of thing TBC would revisit. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 00:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't believe an article about napkins with only two appearances merits a page. — Lapper (talk) 00:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
This isn't a running gag yet, nor even an inside joke. It can't be a worthwhile item article; there isn't even a picture of the napkins. —BazookaJoe 00:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)