Talk:Lurker
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(agree) |
(→Merge: reply) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Even though thia topic's been dormant, I agree with merging the article with [[Strong Sad]]. I feel the information deserves to be a part of the wiki, but doesn't deserve its own page. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 20:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ::Even though thia topic's been dormant, I agree with merging the article with [[Strong Sad]]. I feel the information deserves to be a part of the wiki, but doesn't deserve its own page. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 20:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::Agree. '''Merge'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 20:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | :::Agree. '''Merge'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 20:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Unless anyone has any immediate objections, perhaps we should merge it right now. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 03:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:39, 4 January 2007
Merge
This should be merged with Strong Sad since nobody else is called a lurker. I also don't think it's significant enough to warrant it's own article. Loafing
06:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- All right, then. Go ahead. Retromaniac 16:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Even though thia topic's been dormant, I agree with merging the article with Strong Sad. I feel the information deserves to be a part of the wiki, but doesn't deserve its own page. Bluebry 20:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
