Talk:The Cheat's Soldering Iron
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(reply) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Come on. It should be obvious that this page isn't needed. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 13:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | Come on. It should be obvious that this page isn't needed. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 13:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah, I think the mention in Coloring is enough. I mean, how do we even know it's a soldering iron, or TC's soldering iron for that matter?[[User:Coveredinharmony|CoveredinSuudzu]] 14:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | :Yeah, I think the mention in Coloring is enough. I mean, how do we even know it's a soldering iron, or TC's soldering iron for that matter?[[User:Coveredinharmony|CoveredinSuudzu]] 14:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::You say it should be obvious that this page isn't needed, yet it's existed since January and no one's tagged it. Are you suggesting that the users of this wiki are stupid or incompetent? If an article's existed for that long, probably someone liked it at some point and you should exercise a bit more restraint in commenting about it. | ||
+ | ::As for the article: There's no need for the three occurences, as would be necessary for running gags. The item is distinctive, though it doesn't play a terribly important role in the email. So I'm pretty much ambivalent. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:53, 21 May 2007
Come on. It should be obvious that this page isn't needed. — Defender1031*Talk 13:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think the mention in Coloring is enough. I mean, how do we even know it's a soldering iron, or TC's soldering iron for that matter?CoveredinSuudzu 14:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- You say it should be obvious that this page isn't needed, yet it's existed since January and no one's tagged it. Are you suggesting that the users of this wiki are stupid or incompetent? If an article's existed for that long, probably someone liked it at some point and you should exercise a bit more restraint in commenting about it.
- As for the article: There's no need for the three occurences, as would be necessary for running gags. The item is distinctive, though it doesn't play a terribly important role in the email. So I'm pretty much ambivalent. Heimstern Läufer
14:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)