Talk:Audio Quality
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (Whoops...forgot one.) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:On the contrary, audio quality is measurable in terms of bitrate and such. Please don't slap <nowiki>{{tbd}}</nowiki> tags on this kind of an article before it has a chance to be developed. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 20:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | :On the contrary, audio quality is measurable in terms of bitrate and such. Please don't slap <nowiki>{{tbd}}</nowiki> tags on this kind of an article before it has a chance to be developed. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 20:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
::I suppose you're correct in that I'm becoming the thing that I hate so much, though you can't say it [[Talk:Inconsistencies within the Homestar Runner Universe|hasn't]] [[Talk:The Cheat's Privileges|happened]] [[Talk:Catch Phrases|to]] [[Talk:Malapropisms|me]] [[Talk:LELLOWTAPE|before]]. Coming up with some good, viable examples would certainly sway me.{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 21:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ::I suppose you're correct in that I'm becoming the thing that I hate so much, though you can't say it [[Talk:Inconsistencies within the Homestar Runner Universe|hasn't]] [[Talk:The Cheat's Privileges|happened]] [[Talk:Catch Phrases|to]] [[Talk:Malapropisms|me]] [[Talk:LELLOWTAPE|before]]. Coming up with some good, viable examples would certainly sway me.{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 21:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :It's dot com, I totally agree bitrate or some other objective standard would be a good measuring stick. But then we need an objective standard bitrate for high quality, low quality, etc. I'd also think we'd need to put the bitrate of each toon/email/whatever next to the toon/email/whatever in the article. Does that make any sense? [[User:Coveredinharmony|CoveredinSuudzu]] 15:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:05, 1 June 2007
I don't know about this article. I hear very little difference in the audio quality; even the very old material on the site has good audio quality, the voices are just different. · · T2|Things 20:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
This content of this article would be pretty hard to keep objective. — Lapper (talk) 20:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- On the contrary, audio quality is measurable in terms of bitrate and such. Please don't slap {{tbd}} tags on this kind of an article before it has a chance to be developed. — It's dot com 20:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's dot com, I totally agree bitrate or some other objective standard would be a good measuring stick. But then we need an objective standard bitrate for high quality, low quality, etc. I'd also think we'd need to put the bitrate of each toon/email/whatever next to the toon/email/whatever in the article. Does that make any sense? CoveredinSuudzu 15:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
