User talk:OptimisticFool
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Cheers.) |
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (→Blanking your talk page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Blanking your talk page == | ||
| + | Blanking your talk page, especially so soon after receiving a comment, just creates confusion. Does {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:OptimisticFool&diff=507473&oldid=507469 this}} mean that you now agree with me? Or do you continue to disagree with me, but I'm supposed to assume that at least you have read my comments? All I'm really sure of is that you read the very last word of what I wrote. It's true that there is {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:OptimisticFool&diff=507074&oldid=507048 no rule against this}} (although there was no need to bite Slipstream's head off; he was just trying to point out something he didn't think you knew), but it is odd that you continue to blank this page, not to mention that it makes finding previous discussion in the history or linking to threads a chore. This wiki is built by a community (which includes valuable contributions from ''all'' ages), and we wouldn't get very far without the ability to revisit old threads. Do you see where we're coming from? Would you please shed some more light on this. Hoping you reply here (as opposed to in the edit summary removing this comment), [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:28, 18 October 2007
Blanking your talk page
Blanking your talk page, especially so soon after receiving a comment, just creates confusion. Does this mean that you now agree with me? Or do you continue to disagree with me, but I'm supposed to assume that at least you have read my comments? All I'm really sure of is that you read the very last word of what I wrote. It's true that there is no rule against this (although there was no need to bite Slipstream's head off; he was just trying to point out something he didn't think you knew), but it is odd that you continue to blank this page, not to mention that it makes finding previous discussion in the history or linking to threads a chore. This wiki is built by a community (which includes valuable contributions from all ages), and we wouldn't get very far without the ability to revisit old threads. Do you see where we're coming from? Would you please shed some more light on this. Hoping you reply here (as opposed to in the edit summary removing this comment), It's dot com 03:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
