User talk:Sam the Man
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→You LIE!) |
|||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
You said you weren't gonna be here for a week... Well, it's good to see that you are here despite that... I don't really get what the point would have been anyway. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | You said you weren't gonna be here for a week... Well, it's good to see that you are here despite that... I don't really get what the point would have been anyway. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == [[User talk:KlingOnMyDreams]] == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sam, your comments to KlingOnMyDreams were extremely tactless and unprofessional. There's nothing wrong with a userpage that contains some amount of nonsense (we wouldn't encourage it, but there's no reason to discourage it, either). Therefore, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKlingOnMyDreams&diff=523695&oldid=523693 this comment] was rather rude. [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:KlingOnMyDreams&diff=next&oldid=523696 This one] was even more so. As I've pointed out to you several times, our first interactions with users should be '''positive'''. Comments like the ones you wrote are likely to just drive new users away. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then, KlingOnMyDreams replied with nonsense, which wasn't a good idea, but hardly disruptive in and of itself, especially since your comments provoked it. Then you replied with [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:KlingOnMyDreams&diff=prev&oldid=523699 this]. You do not have the authority to determine acceptable behavior. You are not a sysop and have shown no sign of having the judgment required to be a sysop. Then, when I added a comment correcting your actions and trying to fix things up with KlingOnMyDreams, you contradicted me. This was apallingly poor judgment. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I regret being this harsh, but you have several times over the past few weeks exhibited tactless behavior toward new users, and frankly, this needs to stop. The wiki wants to extend a friendly welcome to its new users, and your edits are countering that goal. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 22:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:15, 2 December 2007
Contents |
Welcome
Hi! This is Sam the Man. Please leave me message and I'll get back to you. "BEEP"!
Strong Bad Allegiance
Leave a message and I'll get back to you. Remember the Cut-Off.
Back Reply
Please, please stop playing with the new members
Look, I know you have been warned many times about welcoming new members unprofessionaly, but that isn't what this message is about, quite simply, stop doing all these dumb quizzes. The problem is that this seems to make them hyperactive. I don't know why it does that, but it does and usually, it's better to just leave them. It's probably because they think they've earned respect and can do whatever they want. Please see this as advice, I trying to help.--~ SlipStream 23:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm doing what? I don't have any quizzes. And I'm certainly not playing with the new users. I'm confused.
Sam the Man
12:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe I should explain, the quiz I speak of is here. http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/User_talk:HAJ . But that's far from the only instance of you doing that, although it is by far the easiest to find, and even if there are no other quizzes, there is pointless new member talk page posts. Anyway, welcomes should be personal, like, if they right a userpage, you can discuss the contents. Thanks, --~ SlipStream 21:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
This is hardly vandalism, Sam. "lmao" does stand for "Laughing my A** Off" (though withought the "**"'s). That person may just think that it would be better to put the real word in. That's all, Homestar-Winner (talk) 16:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I know that you don't know me that well, I know it seems fishy ( or how ever you spell it) but trust me i did not do it. But i am sorry of what happened User:The-homsarrunner
Reverting good edits
Please don't revert good edits. If there's any chance you just need to clear your cache, then you should assume that's the problem until proven otherwise. Thanks. — It's dot com 04:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Took you're advice
Added you to my list.AWMPSCE
Simpsons wiki
First of all posts like this are considered spam. Secondly, there is already a well-established Simpsons wiki. Cheers. — Defender1031*Talk 19:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
You LIE!
You said you weren't gonna be here for a week... Well, it's good to see that you are here despite that... I don't really get what the point would have been anyway. — Defender1031*Talk 16:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
User talk:KlingOnMyDreams
Sam, your comments to KlingOnMyDreams were extremely tactless and unprofessional. There's nothing wrong with a userpage that contains some amount of nonsense (we wouldn't encourage it, but there's no reason to discourage it, either). Therefore, this comment was rather rude. This one was even more so. As I've pointed out to you several times, our first interactions with users should be positive. Comments like the ones you wrote are likely to just drive new users away.
Then, KlingOnMyDreams replied with nonsense, which wasn't a good idea, but hardly disruptive in and of itself, especially since your comments provoked it. Then you replied with this. You do not have the authority to determine acceptable behavior. You are not a sysop and have shown no sign of having the judgment required to be a sysop. Then, when I added a comment correcting your actions and trying to fix things up with KlingOnMyDreams, you contradicted me. This was apallingly poor judgment.
I regret being this harsh, but you have several times over the past few weeks exhibited tactless behavior toward new users, and frankly, this needs to stop. The wiki wants to extend a friendly welcome to its new users, and your edits are countering that goal. Heimstern Läufer 22:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)