Talk:retroCRUSH Interview
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→404'd!: Yes, it's an old topic.. but it's an unresolved topic.) |
(→404'd!: Not no more.) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
:It's also linked to as http://www.retrocrush.com/archive2/homestar/ from http://retrocrush.buzznet.com/archive.html , but that link doesn't work either.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | :It's also linked to as http://www.retrocrush.com/archive2/homestar/ from http://retrocrush.buzznet.com/archive.html , but that link doesn't work either.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
::How about our good friend the {{p|l=http://www.archive.org Wayback Machine}}? http://web.archive.org/web/20051119113731/http://www.retrocrush.com/homestar/index2.html At least it's viewable that way. And this article kinda ... sucks ... as it is. =] Is there a reason we don't even summarize or give background or anything? {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 07:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC) | ::How about our good friend the {{p|l=http://www.archive.org Wayback Machine}}? http://web.archive.org/web/20051119113731/http://www.retrocrush.com/homestar/index2.html At least it's viewable that way. And this article kinda ... sucks ... as it is. =] Is there a reason we don't even summarize or give background or anything? {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 07:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::I wrote to the interviewer again. He has now fixed the link mentioned by Loafing. Oh, and he said, "I still would prefer a link to the interview, not a reprint." So, now we have a working link to the interview again. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 04:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 04:35, 28 September 2008
Attempting To Contact... ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 06:23, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Hello, I am an administrator at a non-profit, collective knowledge base website about Homestar Runner. I am emailing you in connection with the interview that you conducted with the creators of Homestarrunner.com a while back, namely this one: http://www.retrocrush.com/homestar/index2.html My question is wheather or not you would allow us to write a transcript to your interview on our website, namely here: http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/retroCRUSH_Interview which in turn is here: http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/Interviews_and_Public_Appearances Of course the creator and/or your website would be given complete credit, along with a link to the original interview. Please let us know whether or not this would be possible. Thank you, -Thunderbird
I later recieved this reply:
You can link to it, but I don't want it reprinted elsewhere. Thanks for asking, though. -Robert
Done and done, we can't reprint. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 19:11, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)
[edit] 404'd!
The interview is apparently gone now. Now what do we do? --DorianGray 21:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- It's also linked to as http://www.retrocrush.com/archive2/homestar/ from http://retrocrush.buzznet.com/archive.html , but that link doesn't work either. Loafing
21:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- How about our good friend the Wayback Machine? http://web.archive.org/web/20051119113731/http://www.retrocrush.com/homestar/index2.html At least it's viewable that way. And this article kinda ... sucks ... as it is. =] Is there a reason we don't even summarize or give background or anything?
OptimisticFool 07:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- I wrote to the interviewer again. He has now fixed the link mentioned by Loafing. Oh, and he said, "I still would prefer a link to the interview, not a reprint." So, now we have a working link to the interview again. OptimisticFool 04:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- I wrote to the interviewer again. He has now fixed the link mentioned by Loafing. Oh, and he said, "I still would prefer a link to the interview, not a reprint." So, now we have a working link to the interview again.
- How about our good friend the Wayback Machine? http://web.archive.org/web/20051119113731/http://www.retrocrush.com/homestar/index2.html At least it's viewable that way. And this article kinda ... sucks ... as it is. =] Is there a reason we don't even summarize or give background or anything?
