HRWiki:Sandbox
From Homestar Runner Wiki
The McArby (Talk | contribs) |
(a thought) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
fail | fail | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hey, guys? I'm thinking you're taking this too seriously. It's the Sandbox. Anyways, when you complain about the non-test edits flooding up the RC, then revert the edit, then edit something else, then revert that too to the original message about non-test edits, you are actually flooding the RC even more. And now that every edit is a big one all I see are those scary red negative numbers. | ||
+ | |||
+ | And I believe it's more effective to put a note on a spamming user's talk page, then to constantly revert him. If it bothers you so much, you know. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 22:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:10, 15 December 2009
Hey guys. The Sandbox is really for editing tests. It's not meant as a place for idle chit-chat or games. Heimstern Läufer 01:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- We ran out of thigs to
play withtest.
- If you've got nothing to test, there's no need to use the sandbox at all, is there now. Heimstern Läufer
04:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- If you've got nothing to test, there's no need to use the sandbox at all, is there now. Heimstern Läufer
T EST INGA DECEM BERWEEN TR EE
fail
Hey, guys? I'm thinking you're taking this too seriously. It's the Sandbox. Anyways, when you complain about the non-test edits flooding up the RC, then revert the edit, then edit something else, then revert that too to the original message about non-test edits, you are actually flooding the RC even more. And now that every edit is a big one all I see are those scary red negative numbers.
And I believe it's more effective to put a note on a spamming user's talk page, then to constantly revert him. If it bothers you so much, you know. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 22:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC)