Talk:Intros Relevant to the Email
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→New Name?) |
(Difficult rename choice) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | |||
== New Name? == | == New Name? == | ||
Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Well, I was the one who made this link, and I didnt realize the link would be the title (cut me some slack, Im new here). I agree the Related to the Email isnt a very good title, and I think [[ User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]]s idea is good. I also suggest Intros Used Later On. [[User:BanditoDorito|BanditoDorito]] | Well, I was the one who made this link, and I didnt realize the link would be the title (cut me some slack, Im new here). I agree the Related to the Email isnt a very good title, and I think [[ User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]]s idea is good. I also suggest Intros Used Later On. [[User:BanditoDorito|BanditoDorito]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | :This is a frusterating article as, despite my best efforts, I have yet to come up with a decent name, nor do I think those suggested describe the article particularly well. The most literal name would be "Email Intros Referenced Within The Email, but that's a bit excessive.--[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] [[User talk:Jellote|wuz]] [[Special:Contributions/Jellote|here]] 04:08, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:08, 3 December 2011
New Name?
Since the main article was tagged with possibly needing a new commando name, I suggest Email Intros Reused. Because that's what the article covers, Strong Bad singing an intro and the intro coming up again in the same email later. — Ngamer01 16:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Well, I was the one who made this link, and I didnt realize the link would be the title (cut me some slack, Im new here). I agree the Related to the Email isnt a very good title, and I think Ngamer01s idea is good. I also suggest Intros Used Later On. BanditoDorito
- This is a frusterating article as, despite my best efforts, I have yet to come up with a decent name, nor do I think those suggested describe the article particularly well. The most literal name would be "Email Intros Referenced Within The Email, but that's a bit excessive.--Jellote wuz here 04:08, 3 December 2011 (UTC)