Talk:Bubs's Napkins
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
BazookaJoe (Talk | contribs) (reply to self) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::This isn't a running gag yet, nor even an inside joke. It can't be a worthwhile item article; there isn't even a picture of the napkins. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 00:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | :::This isn't a running gag yet, nor even an inside joke. It can't be a worthwhile item article; there isn't even a picture of the napkins. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 00:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
::::I sit corrected. Not quite a running gag yet, but fine as an item page. (It does seem like a weird thing to make a page about, but I'm sure I'll get over it.) —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 02:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | ::::I sit corrected. Not quite a running gag yet, but fine as an item page. (It does seem like a weird thing to make a page about, but I'm sure I'll get over it.) —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 02:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::Once again you are mixing running gags with items. The later don't have the three appearances rule. This is a fine page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:19, 14 November 2006
Is that the real name? If so, does this really garner an article of it's own? --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 00:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I doubt this item would have any more real a name than this. While it does not pass the "three appearance" rule, I think it's unique enough (and funny enough) to merit a page. This seems like just the sort of thing TBC would revisit. - Qermaq - (T/C)
00:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't believe an article about napkins with only two appearances merits a page. — Lapper (talk) 00:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- This isn't a running gag yet, nor even an inside joke. It can't be a worthwhile item article; there isn't even a picture of the napkins. —BazookaJoe 00:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I sit corrected. Not quite a running gag yet, but fine as an item page. (It does seem like a weird thing to make a page about, but I'm sure I'll get over it.) —BazookaJoe 02:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Once again you are mixing running gags with items. The later don't have the three appearances rule. This is a fine page. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 06:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I sit corrected. Not quite a running gag yet, but fine as an item page. (It does seem like a weird thing to make a page about, but I'm sure I'll get over it.) —BazookaJoe 02:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- This isn't a running gag yet, nor even an inside joke. It can't be a worthwhile item article; there isn't even a picture of the napkins. —BazookaJoe 00:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't believe an article about napkins with only two appearances merits a page. — Lapper (talk) 00:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
