User talk:MichaelXX2

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 15:01, 10 January 2009

Main | Talk | Contributions | My signature

User:MichaelXX2/Archivenav Welcome to the Talk section of my User page!

Image edits

Heylo, MichaelXX2. Good jorb on touching up those pictures! :-) Just make sure you're not going overboard. For example, here, the "strange smudge thing" was actually his armpit, and here, the "blue speck" was actually a bit of the sky. ;-) Loafing 08:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I knew it was a bit of the sky here, but I thought it looked rather strange and out-of-place. — MichaelXX2 17:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

i agree, out of place. it doesn't really fit. Homsarstrongbad150 15:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Awake or asleep userbox

Oh, thanks! Probably Monroe or Shreveport will do. — MichaelXX2 19:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Strong Bad DVD pictures

Sorry if this makes it sound like your work was all for naught, but can you please re-upload those pictures so they show the front covers? And the articles for Discs 1-3 can finally match those of Discs 4-6? BBG 03:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Policing again

You've been asked before not to police. I'm going to extend that to include reverting sysops who are themselves enforcing the rules. Please don't do it again. — Defender1031*Talk 07:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Dot com has reverted users who have reverted their own talk page before, Danny. — MichaelXX2 08:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

I fail to see how this is relevant, MichaelXX2. You have been warned not to police the wiki because it is something that you get wrong too often. And here, you got it wrong again. Even reverting a perfectly good edit by a sysop. As the link to your talk page archive shows, you have even been warned that you might be blocked. I have to tell you that this is not an empty threat. Please stop policing the wiki or you will be blocked from editing. Policing the wiki includes for example telling other users that they did something wrong or even warning them, and reverting any edit by another user. Loafing 08:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

I meant Dot com has reverted a sysop in the past who has reverted a person who vandalized/spammed their own talk page before. I was going for that edit. No offense, but I feel like I'm getting a nail driven through my head. — MichaelXX2 08:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

At least I'm not going crazy and swearing and saying I'm not doing anything wrong and stuff. I'll try to set boundaries for policing just as a dog would to an invisible electric fence. — MichaelXX2 09:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Not that it changes much, but I am curious to know when and where this edit of Dot com's is. Would you be able to provide a link to the diff you're referring to? — Defender1031*Talk 09:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm looking for it. — MichaelXX2 09:06, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

We don't seem to be getting through to you, so I'm going to give you a few weeks to think about it. Hopefully you can see that we're serious about your not policing the wiki. — It's dot com 16:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

if i'm hearing you correctly, and i think that i am, mike's banned again. see, mike, told you. they're too strict 'round here. Homsarstrongbad150 14:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)