Template talk:NavFlex
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
MichaelXX2 (Talk | contribs) (→Needed?) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Needed?: reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Needed? == | == Needed? == | ||
Is this crap really necessary? Weren't all of our navigational templates okay without this NavFlex stuff? It's done more harm than good. On certain templates like {{t|pn}}, it added an extra box to the left side of it. What does this actually do? {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 18:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | Is this crap really necessary? Weren't all of our navigational templates okay without this NavFlex stuff? It's done more harm than good. On certain templates like {{t|pn}}, it added an extra box to the left side of it. What does this actually do? {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 18:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :This makes one template for all of the navigation templates, rather than re-implimenting the code separately for each one. It's not breaking anything, and It's Dot Com said that he had been thinking of doing something like this for some time now, and the only thing he doesn't like is the name. There's no reason not to keep it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:28, 5 April 2009
Needed?
Is this crap really necessary? Weren't all of our navigational templates okay without this NavFlex stuff? It's done more harm than good. On certain templates like {{pn}}, it added an extra box to the left side of it. What does this actually do? — MichaelXX2 
18:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- This makes one template for all of the navigation templates, rather than re-implimenting the code separately for each one. It's not breaking anything, and It's Dot Com said that he had been thinking of doing something like this for some time now, and the only thing he doesn't like is the name. There's no reason not to keep it. — Defender1031*Talk 18:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
