Talk:Iron Maiden
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Fold back in?) |
(replate template) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | {{ | + | {{deletedtalk|merge=Popular Music References}} |
==Fold back in?== | ==Fold back in?== | ||
Are there really enough references to Iron Maiden to justify page separate from [[Popular Music References]]? The majority of the references are based on the [[Font]], which seems tangental at best. There are a couple legit refs, it looks like it goes down to 2. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 06:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | Are there really enough references to Iron Maiden to justify page separate from [[Popular Music References]]? The majority of the references are based on the [[Font]], which seems tangental at best. There are a couple legit refs, it looks like it goes down to 2. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 06:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC) |
Current revision as of 22:11, 21 April 2010
![]() |
[edit] Fold back in?
Are there really enough references to Iron Maiden to justify page separate from Popular Music References? The majority of the references are based on the Font, which seems tangental at best. There are a couple legit refs, it looks like it goes down to 2. wbwolf (t | ed) 06:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- I concur. Since two of the references are essentially the same, they should be put back on Popular Music References. StarFox 04:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with StarFox,it rarely has any appearances and is not what you would call a running gag.I'll add a picture to at least make it look nice.Rondleman!
Stuff I did.Talk. 15:08 30 November, 2009 (UTC)
- For the record, I created the article. Since two of the facts will be merged, you can put the artist back. My standard for separate pages is 4+ references. StarFox 18:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)