Talk:Hiatuses
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(comment and fix indentation) |
(My 2 cents on the page) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::I think it's an interesting article. It does not just cover the Strong bad Email hiatus. I think we should '''keep''' as of now. {{User:MeltingObject}} 07:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | ::I think it's an interesting article. It does not just cover the Strong bad Email hiatus. I think we should '''keep''' as of now. {{User:MeltingObject}} 07:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::My comment didn't only address the Sbemail hiatus, either. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | :::My comment didn't only address the Sbemail hiatus, either. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::For right now, I would agree that this article doesn't have much information on it. However, the Acknowledge Update Delays page has no information on the current break whatsoever, and Strong Bad Emails only says "They again went on hiatus in October of 2009 and have been since then." I feel that a not insignificant amount of people would come to the wiki to find out about the recent shortage of toons. If we put a few more facts about current projects we know TBC are working on, like Poker Night at the Inventory, I think this might merit its own page, and possibly a main page link as well (to cut down on people posting "Is HR coming back or not?" on talk pages everywhere). '''Keep'''. {{User:Itama/sig}} 06:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:04, 28 October 2010
I continue to believe that this does not deserve an article. First of all, the Strong Bad Email hiatus section is already covered on Strong Bad Email, and that's where it belongs, not here. As for the current complete hiatus, I don't think there's enough to say. All there is is "the site has been on hiatus since November 2009, with a brief return for April Fool's Day 2010." That's pretty much what it says now, and that's pretty much all the potential it has. If the hiatus ever ends, then it might have a spot on Acknowledged Update Delays, but for now, it does not merit coverage. Delete. Heimstern Läufer 
06:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Heimstern here, with same reasons. So, delete as well.
ColdReactive 07:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's an interesting article. It does not just cover the Strong bad Email hiatus. I think we should keep as of now.
Always watching.
- I think it's an interesting article. It does not just cover the Strong bad Email hiatus. I think we should keep as of now.
Oh, I'll tell you what I think of England!!
Hello, I'm MeltingObject, and I am a person. Why you are looking at my profile, I have no idea. I'm also British, which is a bit of a shame looking at Sbemail 22.
In the meantime, please accept my spam advertising and take a look at my YouTube channel: [1]. Thanks.
Must be off to create some unnecessary pages to be put up for deletion. Bye or something. 07:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- My comment didn't only address the Sbemail hiatus, either. Heimstern Läufer
14:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- For right now, I would agree that this article doesn't have much information on it. However, the Acknowledge Update Delays page has no information on the current break whatsoever, and Strong Bad Emails only says "They again went on hiatus in October of 2009 and have been since then." I feel that a not insignificant amount of people would come to the wiki to find out about the recent shortage of toons. If we put a few more facts about current projects we know TBC are working on, like Poker Night at the Inventory, I think this might merit its own page, and possibly a main page link as well (to cut down on people posting "Is HR coming back or not?" on talk pages everywhere). Keep. Itama 06:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- My comment didn't only address the Sbemail hiatus, either. Heimstern Läufer
