HRWiki talk:Disputed Fun Facts
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (STUFF) |
m (→STUFF: reply to oddtodd) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Would it make sense to mention the new [[HRWiki:STUFF|STUFF]] section on this page? It has a lot to do with disptued fun facts. --[[User:oddtodd|oddtodd]] 14:46, 1 Dec 2004 (MST) | Would it make sense to mention the new [[HRWiki:STUFF|STUFF]] section on this page? It has a lot to do with disptued fun facts. --[[User:oddtodd|oddtodd]] 14:46, 1 Dec 2004 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have proposed that the Disputed fun facts template <nowiki>{{disputed}}</nowiki> would be used to direct people to discuss fun facts on the appropriate talk page, and to use ''Disputed Fun Facts'' as a guide. This system would replace the stop-gap "Stuff" page. This is still being decided, as people seem to like using "Stuff". I think we should be using the Talk pages more effectively, as Wikipedia does/(tries to}. [[User:Drhaggis|<nowiki></nowiki>]]- [[User:Drhaggis|Dr Haggis]] - [[User talk: Drhaggis|Talk]] 11:50, 10 Dec 2004 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 18:50, 10 December 2004
This page is based of furrykef's earlier work to control the Fun Fact problem. - [[User:Drhaggis|Dr Haggis]] 16:57, 26 Nov 2004 (MST)
STUFF
Would it make sense to mention the new STUFF section on this page? It has a lot to do with disptued fun facts. --oddtodd 14:46, 1 Dec 2004 (MST)
I have proposed that the Disputed fun facts template {{disputed}} would be used to direct people to discuss fun facts on the appropriate talk page, and to use Disputed Fun Facts as a guide. This system would replace the stop-gap "Stuff" page. This is still being decided, as people seem to like using "Stuff". I think we should be using the Talk pages more effectively, as Wikipedia does/(tries to}. - Dr Haggis - Talk 11:50, 10 Dec 2004 (MST)
