Talk:Old-Timey Strong Bad Evolution

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 17:06, 5 January 2006 by Venusy (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This shouldn't be deleted because it is the only 1936 character evolution page.

I agree.

The changes are so minor that I really don't think this needs to be here. But, I'm not the one who put the deletion tag on the article, so I really don't care either way. It's not my decision. —FireBird|Talk 15:24, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The changes are bigger than the ones Homsar has gone through, and I think they're quite noticeable. Poopsmith Z

Second --Technochocolate 21:32, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Very true. Keep it, I say! --Shippinator Mandy

It is true Homsar has fewer changes than this, and this the only 1936 evolution page. Also, 1936 Strong Bad is one of my favorite characters.-Trogdor da Burninator Jun 2005

Since this is the only page that has evolution of a character from 1936, it shouldn't be deleted. Because then... there would be no 1936 character evolution. What's the point of deleting it anyway?-Darklinkskywalker

They're hateful. --Technochocolate 01:25, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I say keep it. the changes are very noticeable and are worth of their own page --Insanimaniac2005

Well the way I see it, noone has come forward in favor of deleting this. I have taken the liberty of removing the deleted tag. This should stay put. If anyone disagrees, speak up. -- Tony Stony


Link to the latest version is missing or broken, requesting image upload. - 212.94.80.106

The image seems to be fine. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:04, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
It might be just me, but the cell that's supposed to contain the image shows up empty for me. - RWoSC 03:30, 24 October 2005 (UTC), aka 212.94.80.106
I know that this is a few months late, but try disabling anything that stops ads from showing up. The reason is that the image is stored in the /ad/ folder for images, so the ad blockers block it. --videlectrix.pngENUSY discussionitem_icon.gif user.gifmail_icon.gif 17:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm almost certain that those aren't highlights--they're supposed to be a shine, like one would get from the use of pomade or other hair waxes.

Personal tools