Talk:Audio Quality

From Homestar Runner Wiki

I don't know about this article. I hear very little difference in the audio quality; even the very old material on the site has good audio quality, the voices are just different. · · T²|_Things 20:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

This content of this article would be pretty hard to keep objective. — Lapper (talk) 20:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

On the contrary, audio quality is measurable in terms of bitrate and such. Please don't slap {{tbd}} tags on this kind of an article before it has a chance to be developed. — It's dot com 20:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I suppose you're correct in that I'm becoming the thing that I hate so much, though you can't say it hasn't happened to me before. Coming up with some good, viable examples would certainly sway me.· · T²|_Things 21:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

It's dot com, I totally agree bitrate or some other objective standard would be a good measuring stick. But then we need an objective standard bitrate for high quality, low quality, etc. I'd also think we'd need to put the bitrate of each toon/email/whatever next to the toon/email/whatever in the article. Does that make any sense? CoveredinSuudzu 15:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Dot com: So what ARE the bitrates and such? I'm personally against this article without numbers, and I'm only slightly for it with numbers. Just seems too subjective. --Jay (Gobble) 18:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

PS. Don't be a hypocrite. Adding "to be discussed" is not the same thing as "this article is doomed for ultimate deletion in five... four... three...!" --Jay (Gobble) 19:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Jay has a point about the bitrate. Most people who aren't audio aficionados probably have very little idea of what exactly bitrate is, so an explanation is certainly in order.· · T²|_Things 01:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)