Template talk:bottom10

From Homestar Runner Wiki

This is the talk page of a deleted article. Please do not participate in the discussions archived here. If you can provide a reason for the existence of this page that hasn't been discussed below, you may start a new section. Please refer to the inclusion guidelines that are generally applied to judge an article's merit.

Needed?

Is a template like this really necessary? If someone wants the code, they can just get it off the Main Page Talk Page. — MichaelXX2 20:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Supposing they don't know it's on the Main Page talk... --DorianGray 21:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Then they'd have to know this template is here. I don't think this code is (or should be) widespread enough to warrant a template. — It's dot com 21:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

If they really want a code like this so bad, they can get the code from somewhere or ask a sysop. Too many templates spoil the wiki. Maybe if I made a page like this as a mock-up on my namespace so users could use that instead. Like {{User:MichaelXX2/bottom10}} or something. — MichaelXX2 21:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I say keep it. (Granted I made it, but still.) People would use this! Don't you think? It's easier than going to the main page and getting the code.--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 21:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

But this template isn't contributing to the wiki. It's just here to use on namespaces, which you could do with my option above. — MichaelXX2 21:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Do userboxes contribute to the wiki?--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 21:12, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Not really, but they aren't templates like this. Two wrongs don't make a right. — MichaelXX2 21:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

True, but three rights make a left. :P Seriously though, I think it should stay. A bottom 10 is a common thing for userpages, this template makes it easier to put like the email.--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 21:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

You'd still have to find the template. — MichaelXX2 22:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

But the template makes it easier to type, and you have to find it on the main page too.--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 22:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Also, the main page talk page has been archived since then, and I have no idea which archive it's in. I say keep it. Flicky1991 18:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I give keep for it! I can't find the template in the main page talk page archive. Just keep it or baleet all other templates! --Fangoriously 01:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

3 to 1, Michael old boy.--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 15:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Like Michael said, the template is not contributing to the wiki and is not a priority, so, Deleted.Record307 ^Talk/_Contribs 15:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

But it's still only three-to-two marny! How can you delete it on a three-to-two marny?--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 18:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

That's three to three, mind you. If you want the template so bad, just use the code. The real link is here. — MichaelXX2 05:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Sheer numbers aren't as important as what's good for the wiki. This template isn't necessary. Any user who wants to use the code, which isn't that complicated, is free to do so using the link above. — It's dot com 05:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC)