Talk:Pickles

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '==Non-mainstream== Again, it's 100% true. Only two out of eight instances are in toons, with the only other one in easily accessible content being well-hidden. I should also note…')
(Non-mainstream: reply)
 
(includes 6 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Non-mainstream==
==Non-mainstream==
Again, it's 100% true. Only two out of eight instances are in toons, with the only other one in easily accessible content being well-hidden. I should also note that [[Talk:Harry Potter|an article I created]] was deleted for this very reason. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Again, it's 100% true. Only two out of eight instances are in toons, with the only other one in easily accessible content being well-hidden. I should also note that [[Talk:Harry Potter|an article I created]] was deleted for this very reason. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 +
:I have no problem with this sentence being on the page. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 02:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 +
::It’s not true though.  The article you link to was all DVD commentaries.  This one only has two DVD commentaries. Hard disagree. -[[Special:Contributions/174.62.238.201|174.62.238.201]] 03:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 +
:::I'm not just talking about commentaries. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 +
::It depends on what you consider "mainstream". This page lists 2 toons, 2 commentaries, 2 Easter eggs, 1 Quote of the Week, and 1 non-website game. Some of which could be considered mainstream, some might not. Looking at it more closely, I'm changing my vote. Since it depends on your point of view, and it's not relevant to the page, I vote '''not''' to include the sentence (unless it can be changed to make more sense). It doesn't make much difference either way, whether it's included or not. It's just a sentence. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 +
:::What I consider "mainstream" is, as I said, easily accessible. And correction, one Easter egg and one page whose existence is hard to prove. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 +
::::I don't know what you're correcting, what Gfd said is entirely accurate. Either way, even if it WERE true, it would be entirely unremarkable, as it would be a simple coincidence and not a directed "we only reference this in offsite content". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 +
:::::What I'm correcting is that one of the two Easter eggs isn't one; it's a page that's no longer on the 'Net. And another correction, "we ''mostly'' reference this in offsite content". {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:36, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 +
::::::Those corrections are completely immaterial and irrelevant to the topic at hand. They are not directing these references to mostly non-mainstream content, and therefore the additional note would be inappropriate. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 13:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Current revision as of 13:31, 7 January 2019

[edit] Non-mainstream

Again, it's 100% true. Only two out of eight instances are in toons, with the only other one in easily accessible content being well-hidden. I should also note that an article I created was deleted for this very reason. RickTommy (edits) 02:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

I have no problem with this sentence being on the page. hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 02:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
It’s not true though. The article you link to was all DVD commentaries. This one only has two DVD commentaries. Hard disagree. -174.62.238.201 03:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
I'm not just talking about commentaries. RickTommy (edits) 12:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
It depends on what you consider "mainstream". This page lists 2 toons, 2 commentaries, 2 Easter eggs, 1 Quote of the Week, and 1 non-website game. Some of which could be considered mainstream, some might not. Looking at it more closely, I'm changing my vote. Since it depends on your point of view, and it's not relevant to the page, I vote not to include the sentence (unless it can be changed to make more sense). It doesn't make much difference either way, whether it's included or not. It's just a sentence. hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 04:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
What I consider "mainstream" is, as I said, easily accessible. And correction, one Easter egg and one page whose existence is hard to prove. RickTommy (edits) 12:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't know what you're correcting, what Gfd said is entirely accurate. Either way, even if it WERE true, it would be entirely unremarkable, as it would be a simple coincidence and not a directed "we only reference this in offsite content". — Defender1031*Talk 19:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
What I'm correcting is that one of the two Easter eggs isn't one; it's a page that's no longer on the 'Net. And another correction, "we mostly reference this in offsite content". RickTommy (edits) 12:36, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Those corrections are completely immaterial and irrelevant to the topic at hand. They are not directing these references to mostly non-mainstream content, and therefore the additional note would be inappropriate. — Defender1031*Talk 13:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Personal tools