Template talk:block

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(delete?: define "various reasons"...)
Line 1: Line 1:
The template seems to fail with names with spaces; the link to the block log isn't correct. See [[User:The_cheatman|an example]]. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
The template seems to fail with names with spaces; the link to the block log isn't correct. See [[User:The_cheatman|an example]]. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
:Fixed. Althogh I question the need for using this template. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
:Fixed. Althogh I question the need for using this template. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 +
Although people want to delete this, I renewed the link to the Special:Log/block page. As the old link was broken. Your welcome. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 00:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
== delete? ==
== delete? ==

Revision as of 00:29, 21 November 2008

The template seems to fail with names with spaces; the link to the block log isn't correct. See an example. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 23:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. Althogh I question the need for using this template. — It's dot com 16:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Although people want to delete this, I renewed the link to the Special:Log/block page. As the old link was broken. Your welcome. —Mas12806 (talk·contribs) 00:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

delete?

we don't seem to use this anymore... — Defender1031*Talk 03:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Most blocked users just have their user and user talk pages deleted these days. EDIT: I count 6 users that have this on their page. That's nothing on the multitude of blocked registered users. That's not even counting the multitudes more of blocked IPs... — SamSF%20sig.jpgFisher (Come in, Lambert.) 03:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
This is mostly used for special cases, I believe. No need to delete it, it still has use. Homestar Coderhomestar-coder-sig.gif 03:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I agree — there's no need for it to be widely used, but even some of the user pages I see it's on currently should stay as is, for various reasons. Trey56 05:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry guys, but "various reasons" just doesn't do it for me. You'll have to be at least a tad more specific. — SamSF%20sig.jpgFisher (Come in, Lambert.) 00:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools