Talk:Coach Zed

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Wait just one second!

How come Coach Zed gets an article, but how come other easter egg characters don't? It breaks article-keeping rules and concistency, so THIS ARTICLE A DELETE. --Essence of Ghost Water 22:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Y'see, the page you linked to is completely different because they are all Strong Badman characters. Coach Zed most certainly is not. And also, is does not break consistency or any rules, as there are many other pages like it. StrongAwesome 22:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
But they're all Easter Egg characters, so that's why it breaks consistency. And I quote from the rules: "Needs only one appearance in Homestar Runner toons, as long as it is not a minor variation of one of the already established characters, a character in a costume, or a different personality of that character." --Essence of Ghost Water 22:55, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Alright, but now I have a few examples that are minor variations of already established characters, but only one appearance. Now, there's a chance that you feel that these pages should be deleted too, but there are more pages like this. StrongAwesome 23:06, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
How many more pages? IMO, most of those pages (if not all) should be deleted. --Essence of Ghost Water 23:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey, check the category Zed is under for a few more. But, I think the only reason that you want those pages to be deleted is because the policy states so. In my opinion, the policy should be changed, not the articles. StrongAwesome 23:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
We're no admins, so right now, I believe we can't do anything. --Essence of Ghost Water 23:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Notice the definition of "minor variation" is something like a character in costume or a different personality. We're talking about stuff like Mr. Cheatiyama or Halloween costumes. This doesn't look to me like either of those. I'm all for keeping. Heimstern Läufer 23:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
This article contains information not found in the article for do over, information that probably would be lost if we tried to merge it into the email article. It's also got a nice little picture and is five years old. I see no particular reason to delete it. — It's dot com 15:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools