Talk:Main Page 18

From Homestar Runner Wiki

It appears that after April 2, the sound when mousing over Store was removed, and the visual effect is now faster. Is this a glitch that TBC have to fix, or just the new style for the page?

That was a very nice catch. It could be either, but one could add a note on the page either way. — Lapper (talk) 22:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Also, the "email" Wheelchair bit is horribly out of sync for me now. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  22:21, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

And Sherlock doesn't talk. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 22:21, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't think it's intentional, seems more like a downgrade than an upgrade. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 22:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Beautiful. Now not only do they have to bust on the sesquicentenn-email, they have to fix all the broke stuff too. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  22:27, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

I really hope that this is a mistake, or the brothers chaps soon figure out that it was a mistake, and fixes this page. It looks intentional - not only does Sherlock's mumble not get across, but his mouth doesn't move either. the chopper sound as he floats off is gone too, as is bubs-wheelchair zoom sound. this used to be the most amusing main-page, imho, but this represents a SEVERE DOWNgrade... =( The Reportboy, 12:58, 25 April 2006 EST

[edit] Is it just me...

... or is the audio/toon sync back to normal when mousing over "E-mail" again?--68.111.251.45 09:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] HTML stuff

Is it safe to say that no html coding says or should say HTML stuff in the first tag? or did they really do that at first

I now realize that this page does not show Html stuff. Oops The McArby! 22:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Showing the source code

Since it's been reverted twice already - I think that the full text of the source code visible when mousing over Store should be included in the article. I looked at the actual source code of the page itself and it's different. Nevertheless, even if it was exactly the same, we usually have a plain-text version of everything that is written in the toons, so I don't see why not here. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 19:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. — It's dot com 19:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Yep... There's that DeFender guy again, summarily reverting things... so... yeah... I agree too. — Someone who is totally not DeFender1031

I would agree too, but it looks like I'm too late ;-) Loafing 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Awesomeness. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 19:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)