Talk:Strong Bad Email By Title
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (reply regarding article scope) |
(→Scope: agree) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::Ok, I see, but should they be? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 17:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | ::Ok, I see, but should they be? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 17:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::I think DVD sbemails and the like are okay, but Not Quite Strong Bad Emails are not quite Strong Bad Emails, and therefore shouldn't be in the list. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | :::I think DVD sbemails and the like are okay, but Not Quite Strong Bad Emails are not quite Strong Bad Emails, and therefore shouldn't be in the list. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::I agree. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:47, 27 March 2006
Hi guys, I have created the Strong Bad Email list by title using an Excel Spreadsheet following the format of this page. The only thing it doesn't have is that they are not separated by each letter, I will let someone else do it. --Stux 17:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I did this thing cuz the page was listed as a stub, and it seemed it was short, but the list may be complete, can anybody verify? If it is, then this page should not be listed as a stub (once it has a short intro I guess). --Stux 17:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- It was originally listed as a stub because I just pasted a (complete) list with no formatting. Since then, it has been made to look a little nicer, but there's currently still no intro or category or anything. — It's dot com 17:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Scope
Why are we adding "Lookin At A Thing In A Bag"? "Puppet Time"? How are these even remotely Sbemails? - Qermaq - (T/C) 17:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- I added them cuz they are listed here as NQSBe's. --Stux 17:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, I see, but should they be? - Qermaq - (T/C)
17:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- I think DVD sbemails and the like are okay, but Not Quite Strong Bad Emails are not quite Strong Bad Emails, and therefore shouldn't be in the list. — It's dot com 17:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- I agree.
Trey56 17:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- I agree.
- I think DVD sbemails and the like are okay, but Not Quite Strong Bad Emails are not quite Strong Bad Emails, and therefore shouldn't be in the list. — It's dot com 17:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, I see, but should they be? - Qermaq - (T/C)