Talk:SBLOUNSKCHED! Jingle

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 01:53, 15 March 2007

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

Absolutely don't delete. Sblounskched deserves a separate page. — Lapper (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I disagree. do not delete. Loafing

01:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I disagree as well — this is all covered in candy product.

Trey56 01:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Come on guys! i worked hard on this! so, its short, but who doesn't love that little... Jingle!

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{ttbd}}
-Absolutely delete. If this isn't part of [[SBLOUNSKCHED!]] already, put it there, but this definitely doesn't deserve a separate page. &mdash; {{User:Lapper/sig}} 23:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
+Absolutely don't delete. Sblounskched deserves a separate page. &mdash; {{User:Lapper/sig}} 23:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
-:I agree. '''delete'''.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
+:I disagree. ''' do not delete'''.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
-::I agree as well &mdash; this is all covered in [[candy product]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
+::I disagree as well &mdash; this is all covered in [[candy product]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 == Deletion;NO SANITY! ==
 Come on guys! i worked hard on this! so, its short, but who doesn't love that little... ''Jingle!''